Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34045543›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Activity in the brain's valuation and mentalizing networks is associated with propagation of online recommendations.

Elisa C Baek, Matthew Brook O'Donnell, Christin Scholz, Rui Pei, Javier O Garcia, Jean M Vettel, Emily B Falk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elisa C BaekAnnenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, 3620 Walnut St., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. elisabaek@g.ucla.edu.
Matthew Brook O'DonnellAnnenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, 3620 Walnut St., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Christin ScholzAmsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rui PeiAnnenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, 3620 Walnut St., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Javier O GarciaUS DEVCOM, Army Research Laboratory, Adelphi, USA.
Jean M VettelUS DEVCOM, Army Research Laboratory, Adelphi, USA.
Emily B FalkAnnenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, 3620 Walnut St., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. emily.falk@asc.upenn.edu.

Funding

Can neuroscience dramatically improve our ability to design health communicationsDP2DA035156 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FALK, EMILY · 2012 to 2012
$2.3M
NIDA NIH HHS DP2 DA035156NIH HHS 1DP2DA03515601
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Word of mouth recommendations influence a wide range of choices and behaviors. What takes place in the mind of recommendation receivers that determines whether they will be successfully influenced? Prior work suggests that brain systems implicated in assessing the value of stimuli (i.e., subjective valuation) and understanding others' mental states (i.e., mentalizing) play key roles. The current study used neuroimaging and natural language classifiers to extend these findings in a naturalistic context and tested the extent to which the two systems work together or independently in responding to social influence. First, we show that in response to text-based social media recommendations, activity in both the brain's valuation system and mentalizing system was associated with greater likelihood of opinion change. Second, participants were more likely to update their opinions in response to negative, compared to positive, recommendations, with activity in the mentalizing system scaling with the negativity of the recommendations. Third, decreased functional connectivity between valuation and mentalizing systems was associated with opinion change. Results highlight the role of brain regions involved in mentalizing and positive valuation in recommendation propagation, and further show that mentalizing may be particularly key in processing negative recommendations, whereas the valuation system is relevant in evaluating both positive and negative recommendations.

Indexed as

Peer InfluenceSocial MediaSocial PerceptionAdultBrainFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMentalizationNatural Language Processing

Identifiers

PMID34045543
PMCPMC8160140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.