Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34045542›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Supervised binary classification methods for strawberry ripeness discrimination from bioimpedance data.

Pietro Ibba, Christian Tronstad, Roberto Moscetti, Tanja Mimmo, Giuseppe Cantarella, Luisa Petti, Ørjan G Martinsen, Stefano Cesco, Paolo Lugli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Classifying Storage Temperature for Mandarin (Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Plant Tissue Modelling Using Power-Law Filters.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Pietro IbbaFaculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bolzano-Bozen, 39100, Bolzano-Bozen, Italy. pibba@unibz.it.
Christian TronstadDepartment of Clinical and Biomedical Engineering, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, 0315, Norway.
Roberto MoscettiDepartment for Innovation in Biological, Agro-Food and Forest Systems, University of Tuscia, 01100, Viterbo, Italy.
Tanja MimmoFaculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bolzano-Bozen, 39100, Bolzano-Bozen, Italy.
Giuseppe CantarellaFaculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bolzano-Bozen, 39100, Bolzano-Bozen, Italy.
Luisa PettiFaculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bolzano-Bozen, 39100, Bolzano-Bozen, Italy. luisa.petti@unibz.it.
Ørjan G MartinsenDepartment of Clinical and Biomedical Engineering, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, 0315, Norway.
Stefano CescoFaculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bolzano-Bozen, 39100, Bolzano-Bozen, Italy.
Paolo LugliFaculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bolzano-Bozen, 39100, Bolzano-Bozen, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Strawberry is one of the most popular fruits in the market. To meet the demanding consumer and market quality standards, there is a strong need for an on-site, accurate and reliable grading system during the whole harvesting process. In this work, a total of 923 strawberry fruit were measured directly on-plant at different ripening stages by means of bioimpedance data, collected at frequencies between 20 Hz and 300 kHz. The fruit batch was then splitted in 2 classes (i.e. ripe and unripe) based on surface color data. Starting from these data, six of the most commonly used supervised machine learning classification techniques, i.e. Logistic Regression (LR), Binary Decision Trees (DT), Naive Bayes Classifiers (NBC), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Multi-Layer Perceptron Networks (MLP), were employed, optimized, tested and compared in view of their performance in predicting the strawberry fruit ripening stage. Such models were trained to develop a complete feature selection and optimization pipeline, not yet available for bioimpedance data analysis of fruit. The classification results highlighted that, among all the tested methods, MLP networks had the best performances on the test set, with 0.72, 0.82 and 0.73 for the F[Formula: see text], F[Formula: see text] and F[Formula: see text]-score, respectively, and improved the training results, showing good generalization capability, adapting well to new, previously unseen data. Consequently, the MLP models, trained with bioimpedance data, are a promising alternative for real-time estimation of strawberry ripeness directly on-field, which could be a potential application technique for evaluating the harvesting time management for farmers and producers.

Indexed as

Machine LearningElectric ImpedanceFragaria

Identifiers

PMID34045542
PMCPMC8160339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.