Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34045522›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Passive sampling and benchmarking to rank HOC levels in the aquatic environment.

Ian John Allan, Branislav Vrana, Jasperien de Weert, Alfhild Kringstad, Anders Ruus, Guttorm Christensen, Petr Terentjev, Norman Whitaker Green

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Ian John AllanNorwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA), Gaustadalléen 21, 0349, Oslo, Norway. ian.allan@niva.no.
Branislav VranaRECETOX, Masaryk University, Brno, Kamenice 753/5, 625 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
Jasperien de WeertDeltares, Delft, The Netherlands.
Alfhild KringstadNorwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA), Gaustadalléen 21, 0349, Oslo, Norway.
Anders RuusNorwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA), Gaustadalléen 21, 0349, Oslo, Norway.
Guttorm ChristensenAkvaplan-Niva AS, Fram Centre, Langnes, Postboks 6606, 9296, Tromsø, Norway.
Petr TerentjevInstitute of North Industrial Ecology Problems (INEP), Kola Science Centre, Russian Academy of Science, Apatity, Murmansk Region, Russia.
Norman Whitaker GreenNorwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA), Gaustadalléen 21, 0349, Oslo, Norway.
Norwegian Institute for Water Research · NOAkvaplan-niva · NODeltares · NLKola Science Centre · RUMasaryk University · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification and prioritisation of water bodies presenting elevated levels of anthropogenic chemicals is a key aspect of environmental monitoring programmes. Albeit this is challenging owing to geographical scales, choice of indicator aquatic species used for chemical monitoring, and inherent need for an understanding of contaminant fate and distribution in the environment. Here, we propose an innovative methodology for identifying and ranking water bodies according to their levels of hydrophobic organic contaminants (HOCs) in water. This is based on a unique passive sampling dataset acquired over a 10-year period with silicone rubber exposures in surface water bodies across Europe. We show with these data that, far from point sources of contamination, levels of hexachlorobenzene (HCB) and pentachlorobenzene (PeCB) in water approach equilibrium with atmospheric concentrations near the air/water surface. This results in a relatively constant ratio of their concentrations in the water phase. This, in turn, allows us to (i) identify sites of contamination with either of the two chemicals when the HCB/PeCB ratio deviates from theory and (ii) define benchmark levels of other HOCs in surface water against those of HCB and/or PeCB. For two polychlorinated biphenyls (congener 28 and 52) used as model chemicals, differences in contamination levels between the more contaminated and pristine sites are wider than differences in HCB and PeCB concentrations endorsing the benchmarking procedure.

Identifiers

PMID34045522
PMCPMC8159932
OpenAlexW3164508177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.