Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34045483›Full record

ArticleNPJ breast cancer2021

Neratinib plus trastuzumab is superior to pertuzumab plus trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer xenograft models.

Jamunarani Veeraraghavan, Carolina Gutierrez, Vidyalakshmi Sethunath, Sepideh Mehravaran, Mario Giuliano, Martin J Shea, Tamika Mitchell, Tao Wang, Sarmistha Nanda, Resel Pereira and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Treatment and Resistance.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  4. Pyrotinib is effective in both trastuzumab-sensitive and primary resistant HER2-positive breast tumors.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jamunarani VeeraraghavanLester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. jveerara@bcm.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9524-9487
Carolina GutierrezLester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Vidyalakshmi SethunathLester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Sepideh MehravaranDepartment of Pathology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Mario GiulianoLester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Martin J SheaLester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Tamika MitchellLester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Tao WangLester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1957-7160
Sarmistha NandaLester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Resel PereiraLester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Robert DavisLester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Kristina GoutsouliakLester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Lanfang QinLester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Carmine De AngelisLester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1158-4630
Irmina DialaPuma Biotechnology Inc., Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Alshad S LalaniPuma Biotechnology Inc., Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Chandandeep NagiLester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Susan G HilsenbeckLester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Mothaffar F RimawiLester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4284-5656
C Kent OsborneLester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Rachel SchiffLester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. rschiff@bcm.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1696-5213
Baylor College of Medicine · USPuma Biotechnology (United States) · US

Funding

Tumor BiologyP30CA125123 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Michael M Ittmann · 2007 to 2026
$73.9M
TUMOR SUPPRESSOR GENES IN BREAST CANCER DEVELOPMENTP50CA058183 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR SAN ANT · PI GUTIERREZ, CAROLLINA · 1992 to 2012
$30.9M
Translational Research in Breast Cancer (SPORE)P50CA186784 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI MATTHEW J ELLIS · 2014 to 2026
$24.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA125123NCI NIH HHS P50 CA058183NCI NIH HHS P50 CA186784
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lapatinib (L) plus trastuzumab (T), with endocrine therapy for estrogen receptor (ER)+ tumors, but without chemotherapy, yielded meaningful response in HER2+ breast cancer (BC) neoadjuvant trials. The irreversible/pan-HER inhibitor neratinib (N) has proven more potent than L. However, the efficacy of N+T in comparison to pertuzumab (P) + T or L + T (without chemotherapy) remains less studied. To address this, mice bearing HER2+ BT474-AZ (ER+) cell and BCM-3963 patient-derived BC xenografts were randomized to vehicle, N, T, P, N+T, or P+T, with simultaneous estrogen deprivation for BT474-AZ. Time to tumor regression/progression and incidence/time to complete response (CR) were determined. Changes in key HER pathway and proliferative markers were assessed by immunohistochemistry and western blot of short-term-treated tumors. In the BT474-AZ model, while all N, P, T, N + T, and P + T treated tumors regressed, N + T-treated tumors regressed faster than P, T, and P + T. Further, N + T was superior to N and T alone in accelerating CR. In the BCM-3963 model, which was refractory to T, P, and P + T, while N and N + T yielded 100% CR, N + T accelerated the CR compared to N. Ki67, phosphorylated (p) AKT, pS6, and pERK levels were largely inhibited by N and N + T, but not by T, P, or P + T. Phosphorylated HER receptor levels were also markedly inhibited by N and N + T, but not by P + T or L + T. Our findings establish the efficacy of combining N with T and support clinical testing to investigate the efficacy of N + T with or without chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting for HER2+ BC.

Identifiers

PMID34045483
PMCPMC8159999
OpenAlexW3165774504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.