Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34045214›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Experiences of cancer immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ExCIm)-insights of people affected by cancer and healthcare professionals: a qualitative study protocol.

Stephen Jennings, Sally Anstey, Janet Bower, Alison Brewster, John Buckman, Deborah Fenlon, Deborah Fitzsimmons, Tessa Watts

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Stephen JenningsSchool of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5251-3308
Sally AnsteySchool of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2295-3761
Janet BowerChemotherapy Day Unit, Hywel Dda University Health Board, Haverfordwest, UK.
Alison BrewsterSouth West Wales Cancer Centre, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Swansea, UK.
John BuckmanPPI representative, Swansea, UK.
Deborah FenlonDepartment of Nursing, College of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7347-8919
Deborah FitzsimmonsSwansea Centre for Health Economics, College of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7286-8410
Tessa WattsSchool of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK wattst1@cardiff.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1201-5192
Cardiff University · GBSwansea University · GBHywel Dda University Health Board · GBSwansea Bay University Health Board · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is a global interest in cancer immunotherapy. Clinical trials have found that one group, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has demonstrated clinical benefits across various cancers. However, research focused on the experiences of people affected by cancer who have undergone this treatment using qualitative methodology is currently limited. Moreover, little is known about the experiences and education needs of the healthcare staff supporting the people receiving these immunotherapies. This study therefore seeks to explore the experiences of using ICIs by both the people affected by cancer and the healthcare professionals who support those people, and use the findings to make recommendations for ICI supportive care guidance development, cancer immunotherapy education materials for healthcare professionals, cancer policy and further research. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Patient participants (n ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The research will be performed in accordance with the UK Policy for Health and Social Care Research and Cardiff University's Research Integrity and Governance Code of Practice (2018). The study received ethical approval from the West Midlands and Black Country Research Ethics Committee in October 2019. Health Research Authority and Health and Care Research Wales approvals were confirmed in December 2019. All participants will provide informed consent. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals, non-academic platforms, the Macmillan Cancer Support website, disseminated at relevant national and international conferences and presented via a webinar. The study is listed on the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Clinical Research Network Central Portfolio.

Indexed as

Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsNeoplasmsDelivery of Health CareHumansImmunotherapyQualitative ResearchWalesImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorsadult oncologyeducation & training (see medical education & training)immunologyoncologyqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID34045214
PMCPMC8162091
OpenAlexW3164136699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.