Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34044905›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and psychiatric sciences2021

Stress reactivity as a putative mechanism linking childhood trauma with clinical outcomes in individuals at ultra-high-risk for psychosis: Findings from the EU-GEI High Risk Study.

I Paetzold, I Myin-Germeys, A Schick, B Nelson, E Velthorst, F Schirmbeck, EU-GEI High Risk Study, J van Os, C Morgan, J Hartmann and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

I PaetzoldDepartment of Public Mental Health, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4054-4331
I Myin-GermeysDepartment of Neurosciences, Center for Contextual Psychiatry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium.
A SchickDepartment of Public Mental Health, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
B NelsonCentre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
E VelthorstDepartment of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
F SchirmbeckDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands.
EU-GEI High Risk Study
J van OsDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7245-1586
C MorganESRC Centre for Society and Mental Health and Social Epidemiology Research Group, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1386-2369
J HartmannCentre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
M van der GaagDepartment of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands.
L de HaanDepartment of Early Psychosis, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands.
L ValmaggiaPsychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
P McGuireDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, King's Health Partners, King's College London, London, UK.
M KemptonDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, King's Health Partners, King's College London, London, UK.
U ReininghausDepartment of Public Mental Health, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
King's College London · GBThe University of Melbourne · AUHeidelberg University · DEArkin · NLIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USKU Leuven · BEParnassia Groep · NL

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/J008915/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsChildhood trauma is associated with an elevated risk for psychosis, but the psychological mechanisms involved remain largely unclear. This study aimed to investigate emotional and psychotic stress reactivity in daily life as a putative mechanism linking childhood trauma and clinical outcomes in individuals at ultra-high-risk (UHR) for psychosis.

methodsExperience sampling methodology was used to measure momentary stress, affect and psychotic experiences in the daily life of N = 79 UHR individuals in the EU-GEI High Risk Study. The Childhood Trauma Questionnaire was used to assess self-reported childhood trauma. Clinical outcomes were assessed at baseline, 1- and 2-year follow-up.

resultsThe association of stress with positive (β = -0.14, p = 0.010) and negative affect (β = 0.11, p = 0.020) was modified by transition status such that stress reactivity was greater in individuals who transitioned to psychosis. Moreover, the association of stress with negative affect (β = 0.06, p = 0.019) and psychotic experiences (β = 0.05, p = 0.037) was greater in individuals exposed to high v. low levels of childhood trauma. We also found evidence that decreased positive affect in response to stress was associated with reduced functioning at 1-year follow-up (B = 6.29, p = 0.034). In addition, there was evidence that the association of childhood trauma with poor functional outcomes was mediated by stress reactivity (e.g. indirect effect: B = -2.13, p = 0.026), but no evidence that stress reactivity mediated the association between childhood trauma and transition (e.g. indirect effect: B = 0.14, p = 0.506).

conclusionsEmotional and psychotic stress reactivity may be potential mechanisms linking childhood trauma with clinical outcomes in UHR individuals.

Indexed as

Psychotic DisordersHumansSelf ReportStress, PsychologicalSurveys and Questionnairesat-risk mental statechildhood abuseecological momentary assessment (EMA)experience sampling method (ESM)stress sensitizationtransition

Identifiers

PMID34044905
PMCPMC8193966
OpenAlexW3161270236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.