Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34044874›Full record

ArticleBMC nutrition2021

The prevalence and associated factors of undernutrition among under-five children in South Sudan using the standardized monitoring and assessment of relief and transitions (SMART) methodology.

Jackline Kiarie, Sarah Karanja, Julius Busiri, Diana Mukami, Colleta Kiilu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jackline KiarieAmref Health Africa in Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.
Sarah KaranjaAmref Health Africa Headquarters, Nairobi, Kenya.
Julius BusiriAmref Health Africa in South Sudan, Juba, South Sudan.
Diana MukamiAmref Health Africa Headquarters, Nairobi, Kenya.
Colleta KiiluAmref Health Africa Headquarters, Nairobi, Kenya. colleta.kiilu@amref.org.
Amref Health Africa · KE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConflict regions bear the heaviest brunt of food insecurity and undernutrition. South Sudan is one of the fragile countries following years of conflict that led to large displacements. Moderate to severe undernutrition among under-five children has been associated with elevated morbidity and mortality. This study, therefore, was conducted to assess the magnitude and factors influencing undernutrition (wasting, underweight and stunting) among children aged 6 to 59 months in Yambio County, South Sudan.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted from 26 October to 6 November 2018 in Yambio County, South Sudan among 630 children aged 6-59 months from the 348 households surveyed in 39 clusters using two-stage cluster sampling design. Data were collected using questionnaires and nutritional anthropometric measurements. The Standardized Monitoring and Assessment of Relief and Transitions (SMART) Methodology was followed to obtain the prevalence of wasting, underweight and stunting based on respective z scores and according to the 2006 world health organization child growth standards. Data were exported to Stata version 16 for further analysis. Bivariate analysis of independent variables and undernutrition was done using binary logistic regression. Mixed effects logistic regression analysis was conducted to control for possible confounders and account for random effects at household and cluster levels. Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (cOR and aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and p-values were computed. P-values of ≤0.05 were considered statistically significant.

resultsThe prevalence of undernutrition explained by wasting (weight-for-height Z-score (WHZ) < - 2), underweight (weight-for-age z-scores (WAZ) < - 2) and stunting (height-for-age z-scores (WHZ) < - 2) were 2.3% (1.3-4.1, 95% CI), 4.8% (3.1-7.5, 95% CI) and 23.8% (19.1-29.2, 95% CI). Male sex (aOR [95% CI], p-value: 5.6 [1.10-30.04], p = 0.038), older child's age (aOR [95% CI], p-value: 30.4 [2.65-347.60], p = 0.006) and non-residents (cOR [95% CI], p-value: 4.2 [1.4-12.2] p = 0.009) were associated with increased risk of wasting. Household size (cOR [95% CI], p-value: 1.09 [1.01-1.18] p = 0.029) and younger child age (cOR [95% CI], p-value: 4.2 [1.34-13.23] p = 0.014) were significantly associated with underweight. Younger child age (aOR [95% CI], p-value: 5.4 [1.82-16.44] p = 0.003) and agricultural livelihood (aOR [95% CI], p-value: 3.4 [1.61-7.02] p = 0.001) were associated with stunting.

conclusionBased on a cut off of less than - 2 standard deviations for 2006 World Health Organization (WHO) child growth standards, the wasting prevalence was very low, underweight prevalence was low while stunting prevalence was high. The county lies in the only livelihood region in South Sudan with bimodal reliable rainfall pattern and it seems that the impact of the 2016 conflicts that lead to large displacements may not have greatly affected under-five undernutrition. Interventions targeted at improving food diversity, increasing nutrition knowledge and enhancing resilience in male children might reduce undernutrition. In the short-term, investment in continued surveillance of nutritional status should be a main focus.

Indexed as

Child UndernutritionConflict regionsFood insecurityStuntingUnderweightWasting

Identifiers

PMID34044874
PMCPMC8161633
OpenAlexW3164710107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.