Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34044810›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2021

Induction chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Xia Li, Qigen Fang, Wei Du, Xu Zhang, Liyuan Dai, Yongming Qiao

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy for the Treatment of Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Single-Arm Phase 2 Clinical Trial.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Immunotherapy: The Fourth Domain in Oral Cancer Therapeutics.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xia LiDepartment of Stomatology, Oral Medicine Center of The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, People's Republic of China.
Qigen FangDepartment of Head Neck and Thyroid, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, People's Republic of China.
Wei DuDepartment of Head Neck and Thyroid, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, People's Republic of China.
Xu ZhangDepartment of Head Neck and Thyroid, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, People's Republic of China.
Liyuan DaiDepartment of Head Neck and Thyroid, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, People's Republic of China.
Yongming QiaoDepartment of Stomatology, Oral Medicine Center of The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, People's Republic of China. qiaoyongming0511@163.com.
Zhengzhou University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of sintilimab combined with induction chemotherapy (IC) in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients.

methodsA total of 163 patients were prospectively enrolled; 98 patients received IC only, and 65 patients received IC with sintilimab. Following neoadjuvant therapy, patients either underwent surgery (31.9%) or chemoradiotherapy (68.1%). Objective response rate (ORR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicities between the two groups were compared.

resultsThe ORR in the IC group was significantly lower than that in the IC with sintilimab group (68.4% vs 84.6%, P = 0.019). Grade 3 or higher acute toxicity occurred in 15 (15.3%) and 12 (18.5%) patients in the IC and IC with sintilimab groups, respectively. However, this difference was not significant (P = 0.596). After follow-up with a median time of 28.0 months, the IC group had a 2-year PFS rate of 27% (95%CI: 18-36%), whereas the IC with sintilimab group had a 2-year PFS rate of 44% (95%CI: 32-56%), and this difference was significant (P = 0.041). The 2-year OS rates in the IC and IC with sintilimab groups were 61% (95%CI: 52-70%) and 70% (95%CI: 60-80%), respectively, the difference was not significant (P = 0.681).

conclusionsAddition of sintilimab to IC could provide longer PFS time than traditional chemotherapy regimen, without increasing the toxicity events.

Indexed as

AdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemoradiotherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingProgression-Free SurvivalProspective StudiesSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedsintilimabHead and neck squamous cell carcinomaImmunotherapy therapySintilimabTPF

Identifiers

PMID34044810
PMCPMC8157730
OpenAlexW3164199908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.