Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34044355›Full record

Trial reportAtencion primaria2021

[I-Gel® laryngeal mask versus bag-valve-mask in instrumental cardiopulmonary resuscitation under capnographic monitoring: Cluster-randomized pilot clinical trial].

Francisco José Cereceda-Sánchez, Juan Clar-Terradas, Rut Moros-Albert, Andreu Mascaró-Galmés, Miguel Navarro-Miró, Jesús Molina-Mula

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Atencion primaria, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Blind intubation in COVID-19 patients airway management.The American journal of emergency medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Francisco José Cereceda-SánchezGerencia SAMU 061 Baleares, Palma de Mallorca, Islas Baleares, España. Electronic address: frajocesa@gmail.com.
Juan Clar-TerradasGerencia SAMU 061 Baleares, Palma de Mallorca, Islas Baleares, España.
Rut Moros-AlbertGerencia SAMU 061 Baleares, Palma de Mallorca, Islas Baleares, España.
Andreu Mascaró-GalmésGerencia SAMU 061 Baleares, Palma de Mallorca, Islas Baleares, España.
Miguel Navarro-MiróGerencia SAMU 061 Baleares, Palma de Mallorca, Islas Baleares, España.
Jesús Molina-MulaUniversidad de las Islas Baleares.
Universitat de les Illes Balears · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the basic airway and the advanced airway with the supraglottic device I-Gel®, by means of capnography during intermediate CPR.

designRandomized experimental pilot study by groups.

settingOut-hospital care basic life support units on the Island of Mallorca.

participantsAdults attended after cardiorespiratory arrest of non-traumatic origin.

interventionsAdvanced airway management during instrumental CPR with I-Gel® or basic CPR with bag-valve-mask, under capnographic monitoring. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Capnometric levels obtained according to the device used, number of insertions of the I-Gel®, cases without achieving correct insertion/ventilation by branches, achievement of ROSC in CPR and number of hospital live admissions.

resultsTwenty-three cases were recruited for analysis. The insertion success rate of the I-Gel® was 92.9% at the first attempt, the mean capnometric values were 16.3mmHg in the control group and 27.4% in the intervention group. 34.8% (n=8) of the patients achieved spontaneous circulation recovery at some point and 26.1% (n=6) were admitted to hospital alive. The survival analysis, taking into account the arrival of the unit and the first minute of ventilations recorded together with the variable hospital admission, suggests a certain trend of greater survival in the intervention branch (P=.066).

conclusionsThe use of I-Gel® raises an improvement in the ventilation of the patients in PCR, evidenced by the mean capnometric values in the intervention group, finding no correlation with CPR outcome variables.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationHeart ArrestLaryngeal MasksAdultHumansIntubation, IntratrachealPilot ProjectsCapnografíaCapnographyCardiopulmonary resuscitationLaryngeal masksMáscaras laríngeasReanimación cardiopulmonar

Identifiers

PMID34044355
PMCPMC8167161
OpenAlexW3164558973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.