Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34044293›Full record

Observational studyRespiratory medicine

Predictors of failure of high flow nasal cannula failure in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19.

Orlando Garner, Deepa Dongarwar, Hamisu M Salihu, Jairo H Barrantes Perez, Jocelyn Abraham, Cameron McBride, Sindhu Mathew, Preethi Antony, Keegan Collins, Katherine L Richards and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Respiratory medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Observational
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Orlando GarnerDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care, And Sleep Section, Baylor College of Medicine, United States. Electronic address: ogarnermd@gmail.com.
Deepa DongarwarCenter of Excellence in Health Equity, Training and Research, Baylor College of Medicine, United States.
Hamisu M SalihuCenter of Excellence in Health Equity, Training and Research, Baylor College of Medicine, United States.
Jairo H Barrantes PerezDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care, And Sleep Section, Baylor College of Medicine, United States.
Jocelyn AbrahamDepartment of Internal Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, United States.
Cameron McBrideDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care, And Sleep Section, Baylor College of Medicine, United States.
Sindhu MathewDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care, And Sleep Section, Baylor College of Medicine, United States.
Preethi AntonyDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care, And Sleep Section, Baylor College of Medicine, United States.
Keegan CollinsDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care, And Sleep Section, Baylor College of Medicine, United States.
Katherine L RichardsDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care, And Sleep Section, Baylor College of Medicine, United States.
Christopher M HowardDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care, And Sleep Section, Baylor College of Medicine, United States. Electronic address: Christopher.howard@bcm.edu.
Baylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypoxemic respiratory failure is a common manifestation of COVID-19 pneumonia. Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure were, at times, being intubated earlier than normal; in part because the options of heated humidified high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and non-invasive ventilation (NIV) were considered potentially inadequate and to increase risk of virus aerosolization. To understand the benefits and factors that predict success and failure of HFNC in this population, we evaluated data from the first 30 sequential patients admitted with COVID-19 pneumonia to our center who were managed with HFNC. We conducted Cox Proportional Hazards regression models to evaluate the factors associated with high flow nasal cannula failure (outcome variable), using time to intubation (censoring variable), while adjusting for comorbidities and immunosuppression. In the majority of our patients (76.7%), the use of HFNC failed and the patients were ultimately placed on mechanical ventilation. Those at increased risk of failure had a higher sequential organ failure assessment score, and at least one comorbidity or history of immunosuppression. Our data suggest that high flow nasal cannula may have a role in some patients with COVID-19 presenting with hypoxemic respiratory failure, but careful patient selection is the likely key to its success.

Indexed as

PandemicsAgedAged, 80 and overCannulaCOVID-19Equipment FailureFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNoninvasive VentilationOxygen Inhalation TherapyRespiratory InsufficiencySARS-CoV-2COVID-19Critical care medicineHigh flow nasal cannulaNovel coronavirusRespiratory failure

Identifiers

PMID34044293
PMCPMC8133822
OpenAlexW3165763399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.