Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34044219›Full record

ReviewEBioMedicine2021

Multiple sclerosis and drug discovery: A work of translation.

Bert A 't Hart, Antonio Luchicchi, Geert J Schenk, Joep Killestein, Jeroen J G Geurts

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EBioMedicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. MOGJournal of neuroinflammation · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis.WIREs mechanisms of disease · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bert A 't HartDepartment Anatomy and Neuroscience, Amsterdam University Medical Center (VUmc), Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department Biomedical Sciences of Cells & Systems, University Medical Center, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; MS-center Amsterdam (www.vumc.com), the Netherlands. Electronic address: thart@amsterdamumc.nl.
Antonio LuchicchiDepartment Anatomy and Neuroscience, Amsterdam University Medical Center (VUmc), Amsterdam, the Netherlands; MS-center Amsterdam (www.vumc.com), the Netherlands.
Geert J SchenkDepartment Anatomy and Neuroscience, Amsterdam University Medical Center (VUmc), Amsterdam, the Netherlands; MS-center Amsterdam (www.vumc.com), the Netherlands.
Joep KillesteinMS-center Amsterdam (www.vumc.com), the Netherlands; Department Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (VUmc), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jeroen J G GeurtsDepartment Anatomy and Neuroscience, Amsterdam University Medical Center (VUmc), Amsterdam, the Netherlands; MS-center Amsterdam (www.vumc.com), the Netherlands.
Amsterdam Neuroscience · NLAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is after trauma the most important neurological disease in young adults, affecting 1 per 1000 individuals. With currently available medications, most of these targeting the immune system, satisfactory results have been obtained in patients with relapsing MS, but these can have serious adverse effects. Moreover, despite some promising developments, such as with B cell targeting therapies or sphingosine-1-phosphate modulating drugs, there still is a high unmet need of safe drugs with broad efficacy in patients with progressive MS. Despite substantial investments and intensive preclinical research, the proportion of promising lead compounds that reaches the approved drug status remains disappointingly low. One cause lies in the poor predictive validity of MS animal models used in the translation of pathogenic mechanisms into safe and effective treatments for the patient. This disturbing situation has raised criticism against the relevance of animal models used in preclinical research and calls for improvement of these models. This publication presents a potentially useful strategy to enhance the predictive validity of MS animal models, namely, to analyze the causes of failure in forward translation (lab to clinic) via reverse translation (clinic to lab). Through this strategy new insights can be gained that can help generate more valid MS models.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease Models, AnimalDrug DiscoveryHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingImmunosuppressive AgentsAnimal modelDrug developmentForward translationReverse translation

Identifiers

PMID34044219
PMCPMC8245896
OpenAlexW3164515955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.