Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34043880›Full record

ArticleJournal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences2021

Impact of board certification system and adherence to the clinical practice guidelines for liver cancer on post-hepatectomy risk-adjusted mortality rate in Japan: A questionnaire survey of departments registered with the National Clinical Database.

Junichi Arita, Hiroyuki Yamamoto, Takashi Kokudo, Kiyoshi Hasegawa, Hiroaki Miyata, Yasushi Toh, Mitsukazu Gotoh, Norihiro Kokudo, Yoshihiro Kakeji, Yasuyuki Seto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Junichi AritaLiver Cancer Study Group of Japan, Japan Society of Hepatology, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1929-8479
Hiroyuki YamamotoNational Clinical Database, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi KokudoLiver Cancer Study Group of Japan, Japan Society of Hepatology, Tokyo, Japan.
Kiyoshi HasegawaLiver Cancer Study Group of Japan, Japan Society of Hepatology, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8734-740X
Hiroaki MiyataNational Clinical Database, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasushi TohThe Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tokyo, Japan.
Mitsukazu GotohThe Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8839-3192
Norihiro KokudoLiver Cancer Study Group of Japan, Japan Society of Hepatology, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshihiro KakejiThe Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasuyuki SetoThe Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 16K10437Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare 201221064A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is unclear to what extent a board certification system and implementation of clinical guidelines improves the quality of hepatectomy.

methodsA web-based questionnaire survey was administered to departments registered with the National Clinical Database (NCD) in Japan between 1 October 2014 and 31 January 2015. Quality indicators (QIs), including affiliations with academic societies, numbers of board-certified doctors affiliated with each institute, and adherence to clinical practice guidelines for hepatocellular carcinoma, were evaluated by calculating risk-adjusted odds ratios (AORs) for 90-day postoperative mortality of patients who had undergone hepatectomy in 2013 and 2014.

resultsOf 1255 departments that had registered at least one hepatectomy in NCD, 592 departments, performing 8601 hepatectomies in total, responded to the questionnaire. AORs were significantly lower in departments that were certified as training hospitals by the Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Society, Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery (JSHBPS), and Japan Society of Hepatology than in non-certified departments. Affiliation of three or more JSHBPS-certified experts or instructors with an institution also contributed to low AORs. None of the QIs regarding implementation of guidelines significantly impacted on the AOR.

conclusionsQuality indicator measurements may improve quality of post-hepatectomy outcomes in Japan.

Indexed as

HepatectomyLiver NeoplasmsCertificationGuideline AdherenceHumansJapanPractice Guidelines as TopicSurveys and Questionnairesboard certificationclinical guidelineshepatectomyquality indicatorquestionnaire survey

Identifiers

PMID34043880
PMCPMC8597098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.