Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34043875›Full record

ArticleHaemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia2021

On-demand treatment with the iron chelator deferasirox is ineffective in preventing blood-induced joint damage in haemophilic mice.

Astrid E Pulles, Lize F D van Vulpen, Katja Coeleveld, Simon C Mastbergen, Roger E G Schutgens, Floris P J G Lafeber

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Pain in Hemophilia: Unexplored Role of Oxidative Stress.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Astrid E PullesDepartment of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8464-4775
Lize F D van VulpenVan Creveldkliniek, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3242-5524
Katja CoeleveldDepartment of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Simon C MastbergenDepartment of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Roger E G SchutgensVan Creveldkliniek, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2762-6033
Floris P J G LafeberDepartment of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Utrecht University · NL

Funding

Novartis Pharma
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEarly intervention in the devastating process of haemophilic arthropathy (HA) is highly desirable, but no disease-modifying therapy is currently available. Considering the pivotal role of iron in the development of HA, iron chelation is considered a promising therapeutic approach. A previous study in haemophilic mice demonstrated that treatment with the iron chelator deferasirox (DFX) 8 weeks before joint bleed induction, attenuated cartilage damage upon blood exposure. However, in haemophilia patients this approach is not opportune given the unpredictable occurrence of hemarthroses.

aimTo evaluate the effectiveness of on-demand DFX treatment, initiated immediately after joint bleed induction.

methodsA joint bleed was induced in 66 factor VIII-deficient mice by infra-patellar needle puncture. Mice were randomly assigned to treatment with either placebo (drinking water) or DFX (dissolved in drinking water) throughout the study. Five weeks after joint bleed induction, inflammation and cartilage damage were assessed histologically. Joints of ten bleed naive haemophilic mice served as controls.

resultsA joint bleed resulted in significant inflammation and cartilage damage in the blood-exposed joint compared with those of control animals, in both the placebo and DFX group (all p = <.05). No differences in tibiofemoral or patellar inflammation (p = .305 and p = .787, respectively) nor cartilage damage (p = .265 and p = .802, respectively) were found between the blood-exposed joints of both treatment groups.

conclusionOn-demand treatment with DFX does not prevent joint damage following blood exposure in haemophilic mice. DFX seems unable to reach the joint in time to exert its effect before the irreversible harmful process is initiated.

Indexed as

Cartilage, ArticularHemophilia AAnimalsDeferasiroxHemarthrosisIron Chelating AgentsMiceDeferasiroxIron Chelating Agentsarthropathiescartilagedeferasiroxhaemophiliahemarthrosisironsynovium

Identifiers

PMID34043875
PMCPMC8361985
OpenAlexW3164960548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.