Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34043839›Full record

ArticleInternational nursing review2021

Nurses' core emergency competencies for COVID-19 in China: A cross-sectional study.

Hongdan Li, Shuju Dong, Li He, Rui Wang, Shiyan Long, Fengming He, Huairong Tang, Ling Feng

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International nursing review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. [Disaster Literacy Status and the Influencing Factors: A National Survey of 107997 Chinese Nurses].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hongdan LiDepartment of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Shuju DongDepartment of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Li HeDepartment of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Rui WangDepartment of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Shiyan LongDepartment of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Fengming HeDepartment of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Huairong TangDepartment of Health Management Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Ling FengDepartment of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Sichuan University · CNWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

National Key R&D Program of China 2017YFC0907504National Key R&D Program of China 2018YFC1311400National Key R&D Program of China 2018YFC1311401Sichuan Science and Technology Department Project of China 2020YFS0155
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo investigate nurses' core emergency competencies for handling the coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) and analyse the factors associated with those competencies.

backgroundCOVID-19 has become a major global public health event. Nursing staff have played an important role in COVID-19 prevention and control. Understanding their emergency competencies for handling COVID-19, and the potential disadvantages will help governments to develop targeted training policies and improve nurses' capacities in relation to pandemics and emergency preparedness.

introductionCOVID-19 is a disastrous infectious disease, but the competencies of nurses in China to handle COVID-19 have not been well documented.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey on nurses from 22 provinces of China in February 2020. The scores of self-report questionnaires were used to analyse their competencies for core emergency care, and linear regression analysis was used to explore influential factors.

resultsA total of 2570 nurses participated. The study revealed that nurses had a good grasp of COVID-19 knowledge, but the majority of nurses lacked experience in isolation ward work and emergency training. We found that age, professional title, work department, major work content, total work time, disaster rescue history, emergency training and infectious disease training were associated with core emergency competencies.

conclusionsChinese nurses were qualified for handling COVID-19 but still need to strengthen the accumulation of practical experience. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Nurses should actively participate in emergencies to strengthen their operational capacity, whether in training or actual practice. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING/HEALTH POLICY: Managers should improve relevant policies to ensure that nurses have more opportunities to participate in the practical training of health emergencies and explore effective training methods to improve the ability of nurses to respond to these.

Indexed as

COVID-19NursesChinaClinical CompetenceCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesChinaCOVID-19emergency competencieshealth emergencyhealth policynurses

Identifiers

PMID34043839
PMCPMC8242649
OpenAlexW3165406921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.