Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34043778›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of surgery2021

Randomized preclinical study of machine perfusion in vascularized composite allografts.

K R Amin, J P Stone, J Kerr, A Geraghty, L Joseph, A Montero-Fernandez, J K Wong, J E Fildes

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. 24-hourFrontiers in transplantation · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K R AminEx-Vivo Lab, Manchester, UK.
J P StoneEx-Vivo Lab, Manchester, UK.
J KerrEx-Vivo Lab, Manchester, UK.
A GeraghtyEx-Vivo Lab, Manchester, UK.
L JosephDepartment of Pathology, Manchester, UK.
A Montero-FernandezEx-Vivo Lab, Manchester, UK.
J K WongBlond McIndoe Laboratories, Division of Cell Matrix Biology and Regenerative Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
J E FildesEx-Vivo Lab, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9366-8955
Greater Manchester Police · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAttempts to improve limb preservation for transplantation using ex vivo perfusion have yielded promising results. However, metabolic acidosis, aberrant perfusate biochemistry and significant perfusion-induced oedema are reported universally. Optimizing perfusion protocols is therefore essential for maintaining tissue health.

methodsA randomized, two-stage open preclinical trial design was used to determine the optimal temperature and mean arterial pressure for machine perfusion. Conditions compared were: normothermic machine perfusion at 70 mmHg (NMP-70); subnormothermic perfusion (28°C) at 70 mmHg; subnormothermic (28°C) perfusion at 50 mmHg; and hypothermic perfusion (10°C) at 30 mmHg. Following this, a head-to-head experiment was undertaken comparing the optimal machine perfusion with static cold storage. Paired bilateral limbs (10 in total) were randomized to either 8 h of static cold storage, or 2 h of static cold storage and 6 h of optimal machine perfusion. Both groups of limbs were then reperfused on a circuit primed with matched blood from unrelated donors for 4 h without immunosuppression.

resultsNMP-70 resulted in less tissue injury and stable perfusion biochemistry. Assessing reperfusion outcomes, static cold storage resulted in acidosis with increased lactate and a worsening electrolyte profile, necessitating bolus infusions of bicarbonate to prevent graft loss. Conversely, NMP-70 was associated with haemodynamic and biochemical stability. Histologically, on reperfusion with allogeneic whole blood, limbs subjected to static cold storage exhibited multifocal ischaemic injury and increased inflammation, which was absent with NMP-70. Static cold storage also resulted in significant oedema compared with NMP-70.

conclusionNormothermic perfusion resulted in superior graft preservation and less reperfusion injury compared with the current static cold storage protocol.

Indexed as

Composite Tissue AllograftsTemperatureAnimalsBlood PressureGraft SurvivalModels, AnimalPerfusionRandom AllocationReperfusion InjurySpecimen HandlingSwine

Identifiers

PMID34043778
PMCPMC10364870
OpenAlexW3085933243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.