Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34043756›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanical engineering2020

In Vivo Characterization of the Swine Airway Morphometry and Motion Based on Computed Tomographic Imaging During Respiration.

Meryll Grace B Castro, Nicole A Varble, Rex C Yung, Bradford J Wood, John W Karanian, William F Pritchard

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Meryll Grace B CastroCenter for Interventional Oncology, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 10 Center Drive, Room 3N320B, MSC 1182, Bethesda, MD 20892.
Nicole A VarblePhilips Research North America, Cambridge, MA 02141; Center for Interventional Oncology, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 10 Center Drive, Room 3N320, Bethesda, MD 20892.
Rex C YungSchool of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, 733 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205.
Bradford J WoodClinical Center Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Center for Interventional Oncology, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892.
John W KaranianCenter for Interventional Oncology, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 10 Center Drive, Room 3N320B, MSC 1182, Bethesda, MD 20892.
William F PritchardCenter for Interventional Oncology, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, Room 3N320B, MSC 1182, Bethesda, MD 20892.
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Center for Interventional OncologyZIDBC011242 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI WOOD, BRADFORD J · 2009 to 2025
$18.7M
Intramural NIH HHS ZID BC011242
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Swine are a commonly used model in translational pulmonary research. However, in vivo airway morphometry during respiration has not been studied in extensive detail using modern imaging tools. Chest computed tomographic was performed in swine (n = 3) at multiple stages of respiration. Morphometric parameters of each airway segment at end-expiration and end-inspiration were compared as well as among matched anatomical regions (proximal and distal; ventral, lateral, and dorsal). Analysis included segment diameter, length, ellipticity, and the bifurcation angle between daughter branches. Deformation of the airway during respiration was qualitatively visualized using a point-to-point deformation map. Comparison of airway generation showed airway diameter and length were larger at end-inspiration in the fourth and seventh generations compared to end-expiration. Bifurcation angle was larger at end-inspiration compared to end-expiration. Analysis by anatomical region showed that length and bifurcation angle were larger at inspiration in the distal airway regions only. Regardless of respiratory phase, the lateral regions had larger diameters and lengths compared to the ventral and dorsal regions at similar generations and proximal regions had larger bifurcation angles. The findings that morphological changes were more prevalent in distal airways during respiration was confirmed by analysis of a deformation map. Compared to human airway models, the relative diameter may be smaller and length may be greater in swine in similar airway generations. This morphometric description of the swine airways during respiration may guide conduct of preclinical translational studies, revealing advantages and limitations of swine models for specific evaluations. Such morphometric parameters may directly determine the suitability of the swine model for the study of lung interventions, in terms of recapitulation of human morphometry dynamics.

Indexed as

RespirationTomography, X-Ray ComputedAnimalsLungMovementSwine

Identifiers

PMID34043756
PMCPMC7580654
OpenAlexW3036142408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.