Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34043716›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

What is good grief support? Exploring the actors and actions in social support after traumatic grief.

Joanne Cacciatore, Kara Thieleman, Ruth Fretts, Lori Barnes Jackson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Development and validation of the Behavioral FAmily Sport SupporT (BFaSST) Scale.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joanne CacciatoreSchool of Social Work, Associate Professor, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5803-1211
Kara ThielemanSchool of Social Work, Adjunct Faculty, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2893-9792
Ruth FrettsAtrius Health, Medical Doctor, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Lori Barnes JacksonSchool of Social Work, Graduate Student, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social support seems to enhance wellbeing and health in many populations. Conversely, poor social support and loneliness are a social determinant of poor health outcomes and can adversely affect physical, emotional, and mental well-being. Social support is especially important in traumatic grief. However, the ways in which grieving individuals interpret and define social support is not well understood, and little is known about what specific behaviours are perceived as helpful. Using qualitative description and content analysis, this study assessed bereaved individuals' satisfaction of social support in traumatic grief, using four categories of social support as a framework. Findings suggest inadequate satisfaction from professional, familial, and community support. Pets emerged with the most satisfactory ratings. Further, findings suggest that emotional support is the most desired type of support following traumatic loss. Implications for supporting bereaved individuals within and beyond the context of the COVID-19 pandemic are discussed.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalCOVID-19GriefPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Social SupportAdultFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID34043716
PMCPMC8158955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.