ArticlePloS one2021
Latent transition analysis of cardiac arrest patients treated in the intensive care unit.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivePost-cardiac arrest (CA) syndrome is heterogenous in their clinical presentations and outcomes. This study aimed to explore the transition and stability of subphenotypes (profiles) of CA treated in the intensive care unit (ICU). PATIENTS AND
methodsClinical features of CA patients on day 1 and 3 after ICU admission were modeled by latent transition analysis (LTA) to explore the transition between subphenotypes over time. The association between different transition patterns and mortality outcome was explored using multivariable logistic regression.
resultsWe identified 848 eligible patients from the database. The LPA identified three distinct subphenotypes: Profile 1 accounted for the largest proportion (73%) and was considered as the baseline subphenotype. Profile 2 (13%) was characterized by brain injury and profile 3 (14%) was characterized by multiple organ dysfunctions. The same three subphenotypes were identified on day 3. The LTA showed consistent subphenotypes. A majority of patients in profile 2 (72%) and 3 (82%) on day 1 switched to profile 1 on day 3. In the logistic regression model, patients in profile 1 on day 1 transitioned to profile 3 had worse survival outcome than those continue to remain in profile 1 (OR: 20.64; 95% CI: 6.01 to 70.94; p < 0.001) and transitioned to profile 2 (OR: 8.42; 95% CI: 2.22 to 31.97; p = 0.002) on day 3.
conclusionThe study identified three subphenotypes of CA, which was consistent on day 1 and 3 after ICU admission. Patients who transitioned to profile 3 on day 3 had significantly worse survival outcome than those remained in profile 1 or 2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.