Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34043696›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Global antibiotic dosing strategies in hospitalised children: Characterising variation and implications for harmonisation of international guidelines.

Michelle N Clements, Neal Russell, Julia A Bielicki, Sally Ellis, Silke Gastine, Yingfen Hsia, Joseph F Standing, A Sarah Walker, Mike Sharland

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Michelle N ClementsMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3442-3947
Neal RussellPaediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's University, London, United Kingdom.
Julia A BielickiPaediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's University, London, United Kingdom.
Sally EllisGlobal Antibiotic Research & Development Partnership, Geneva, Switzerland.
Silke GastineInfection, Immunity and Inflammation, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Yingfen HsiaPaediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's University, London, United Kingdom.
Joseph F StandingInfection, Immunity and Inflammation, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
A Sarah WalkerMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, United Kingdom.
Mike SharlandPaediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's University, London, United Kingdom.
St George's, University of London · GBMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL · GBUniversity College London · GBGlobal Antibiotic Research & Development Partnership · CH

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00004/05Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/22Medical Research Council MR/M008665/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPaediatric global antibiotic guidelines are inconsistent, most likely due to the limited pharmacokinetic and efficacy data in this population. We investigated factors underlying variation in antibiotic dosing using data from five global point prevalence surveys. METHODS &

findingsData from 3,367 doses of the 16 most frequent intravenous antibiotics administered to children 1 month-12 years across 23 countries were analysed. For each antibiotic, we identified standard doses given as either weight-based doses (in mg/kg/day) or fixed daily doses (in mg/day), and investigated the pattern of dosing using each strategy. Factors underlying observed variation in weight-based doses were investigated using linear mixed effects models. Weight-based dosing (in mg/kg/day) clustered around a small number of peaks, and all antibiotics had 1-3 standard weight-based doses used in 5%-48% of doses. Dosing strategy was more often weight-based than fixed daily dosing for all antibiotics apart from teicoplanin, which had approximately equal proportions of dosing attributable to each strategy. No strong consistent patterns emerged to explain the historical variation in actual weight-based doses used apart from higher dosing seen in central nervous system infections, and lower in skin and soft tissue infections compared to lower respiratory tract infections. Higher dosing was noted in the Americas compared to the European region.

conclusionsAntibiotic dosing in children clusters around a small number of doses, although variation remains. There is a clear opportunity for the clinical, scientific and public health communities to consolidate behind a consistent set of global antibiotic dosing guidelines to harmonise current practice and prioritise future research.

Indexed as

International Health RegulationsAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildChild, HospitalizedChild, PreschoolHumansInfantMaleAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID34043696
PMCPMC8159011
OpenAlexW3165744912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.