ArticlePloS one2021
Diagnostic accuracy of pelvic magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of bone marrow involvement in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02733887 (Research on the Lymphoma Staging and Therapeutic Evaluation of 18F-FDG PET/CT Comparing With Whole Body MRI IVIM Functional Imaging), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Research on the Lymphoma Staging and Therapeutic Evaluation of 18F-FDG PET/CT Comparing With Whole Body MRI IVIM Functional Imaging
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Review of the Current and Future Strategies to Evaluate Bone Marrow Infiltration at Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Diagnosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Baseline and interimFrontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Diagnostic performance of integrated whole-bodyFrontiers in oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe investigated the efficacy of pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of bone marrow involvement (BMinv) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. PATIENTS AND
methodsThis was a retrospective study of data from a previous study (NCT02733887). We included 171 patients who underwent bone marrow biopsy (BMB) and bone marrow smear (BMS), pelvic MRI, and whole-body positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) from January 2016 to December 2019 at a single center. BMB/BMS and whole-body PET/CT results were used as reference standards against which we calculated the diagnostic value of pelvic MRI for BMinv in DLBCL patients. A chi-square test was used to compare detection rates, and a receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate diagnostic value of pelvic MRI. Propensity-score matching was performed according to clinical information, and Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed to compare progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients.
resultsThe BMinv detection rate of pelvic MRI (42/171) was higher (P = 0.029) than that of BMB/BMS (25/171), and similar to that of PET/CT (44/171; P = 0.901). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of pelvic MRI were 83.33%, 98.37%, 94.15%, 95.24%, and 93.80%, respectively. Median PFS values were as follows: BMB/BMS-positive, 17.8 months vs. BMB/BMS-negative, 26.9 months (P = 0.092); PET/CT-positive, 24.8 months vs. PET/CT-negative, 33.0 months (P = 0.086); pelvic MRI-positive, 24.9 months vs. pelvic MRI-negative, 33.1 months (P<0.001). Median OS values were as follows: BMB/BMS-positive, 22.3 months vs. BMB/BMS-negative, 29.8 months (P = 0.240); PET/CT-positive, 27.9 months vs. PET/CT-negative, 33.9 months (P = 0.365); pelvic MRI-positive, 27.3 months vs. pelvic MRI-negative, 35.8 months (P = 0.062).
conclusionPelvic MRI is effective for detecting BMinv in DLBCL patients, providing a more accurate indication of PFS than BMB/BMS and PET/CT do. It may ultimately be used to improve the accuracy of clinical staging, guide patient treatment, and evaluate prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.