Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34043650›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Perspectives of nurses' role in interprofessional pharmaceutical care across 14 European countries: A qualitative study in pharmacists, physicians and nurses.

Elyne De Baetselier, Tinne Dilles, Luis M Batalha, Nienke E Dijkstra, Maria I Fernandes, Izabela Filov, Juliane Friedrichs, Vigdis A Grondahl, Jana Heczkova, Ann Karin Helgesen and 17 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Home care nurses' management of high-risk medications: a cross-sectional study.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Elyne De BaetselierFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1586-7825
Tinne DillesFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Luis M BatalhaHealth Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICISA: E), Nursing School of Coimbra (ESEnfC), Coimbra, Portugal.
Nienke E DijkstraResearch Group Care for the Chronically Ill, University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Maria I FernandesHealth Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICISA: E), Nursing School of Coimbra (ESEnfC), Coimbra, Portugal.
Izabela FilovUniversity "St. Kliment Ohridski" Bitola, Bitola, Republic of North-Macedonia.
Juliane FriedrichsMedical Faculty, Institute of Health and Nursing Science, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Vigdis A GrondahlFaculty of Health and Welfare, Østfold University College, Halden, Norway.
Jana HeczkovaInstitute of Nursing Theory and Practice, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-6010-7369
Ann Karin HelgesenFaculty of Health and Welfare, Østfold University College, Halden, Norway.
Sue JordanDepartment of Nursing, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, United Kingdom.
Sarah KeeleyDepartment of Nursing and Clinical Science, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, England, United Kingdom.
Thomas KlattMedical Faculty, Institute of Health and Nursing Science, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Petros KolovosDepartment of Nursing, Laboratory of Integrated Health Care, University of Peloponnese, Sparti, Greece.
Veronika KulirovaInstitute of Nursing Theory and Practice, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Sabina LičenFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, University of Primorska, Izola, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-8795-7985
Manuel Lillo-CrespoDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
Alba MalaraANASTE-Humanitas Foundation, Rome, Italy.
Hana PadysakovaFaculty of Nursing and Professional Health Studies, Slovak Medical University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
Mirko ProsenFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, University of Primorska, Izola, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0001-9943-9037
Dorina PusztaiInstitute of Nursing Sciences, Basic Health Sciences and Health Visiting, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Jorge Riquelme-GalindoDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
Jana RottkovaFaculty of Nursing and Professional Health Studies, Slovak Medical University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
Carolien G SinoResearch Group Care for the Chronically Ill, University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Francesco TalaricoANASTE-Humanitas Foundation, Rome, Italy.
Styliani TziaferiDepartment of Nursing, Laboratory of Integrated Health Care, University of Peloponnese, Sparti, Greece.
Bart Van RompaeyFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo understand healthcare professionals' experiences and perceptions of nurses' potential or ideal roles in pharmaceutical care (PC).

designQualitative study conducted through semi-structured in-depth interviews.

settingBetween December 2018 and October 2019, interviews were conducted with healthcare professionals of 14 European countries in four healthcare settings: hospitals, community care, mental health and long-term residential care.

participantsIn each country, pharmacists, physicians and nurses in each of the four settings were interviewed. Participants were selected on the basis that they were key informants with broad knowledge and experience of PC. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: All interviews were conducted face to face. Each country conducted an initial thematic analysis. Consensus was reached through a face-to-face discussion of all 14 national leads.

results340 interviews were completed. Several tasks were described within four potential nursing responsibilities, that came up as the analysis themes, being: 1) monitoring therapeutic/adverse effects of medicines, 2) monitoring medicines adherence, 3) decision making on medicines, including prescribing 4) providing patient education/information. Nurses' autonomy varied across Europe, from none to limited to a few tasks and emergencies to a broad range of tasks and responsibilities. Intended level of autonomy depended on medicine types and level of education. Some changes are needed before nursing roles can be optimised and implemented in practice. Lack of time, shortage of nurses, absence of legal frameworks and limited education and knowledge are main threats to European nurses actualising their ideal role in PC.

conclusionsEuropean nurses have an active role in PC. Respondents reported positive impacts on care quality and patient outcomes when nurses assumed PC responsibilities. Healthcare professionals expect nurses to report observations and assessments. This key patient information should be shared and addressed by the interprofessional team. The study evidences the need of a unique and consensus-based PC framework across Europe.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAgedEuropeFemaleHospitalsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNursesNurse's RolePatient CompliancePharmaceutical ServicesPharmacistsPhysiciansQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID34043650
PMCPMC8158867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.