Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34043621›Full record

Trial reportPLoS neglected tropical diseases2021

Serological biomarker for assessing human exposure to Aedes mosquito bites during a randomized vector control intervention trial in northeastern Thailand.

Benedicte Fustec, Thipruethai Phanitchat, Sirinart Aromseree, Chamsai Pientong, Kesorn Thaewnongiew, Tipaya Ekalaksananan, Dominique Cerqueira, Anne Poinsignon, Eric Elguero, Michael J Bangs and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Antibodies toFrontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Benedicte FustecUniv Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7032-7311
Thipruethai PhanitchatDepartment of Medical Entomology, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok.
Sirinart AromsereeKhon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-4320-1166
Chamsai PientongKhon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-2797-043X
Kesorn ThaewnongiewOffice of Diseases Prevention and Control, Region 7, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Tipaya EkalaksanananKhon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-2406-2356
Dominique CerqueiraPublic Health & Malaria Control, International SOS, Mimika, Papua, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0001-8893-2088
Anne PoinsignonMIVEGEC, Univ Montpellier, IRD, CNRS, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2921-4486
Eric ElgueroMIVEGEC, Univ Montpellier, IRD, CNRS, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0002-1042
Michael J BangsPublic Health & Malaria Control, International SOS, Mimika, Papua, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-5392-0797
Neal AlexanderLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6707-7876
Hans J OvergaardNorwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-7604-3785
Vincent CorbelUniv Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRKhon Kaen University · THKasetsart University · THLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBMahidol University · THNorwegian University of Life Sciences · NO

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R010161/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAedes mosquitoes are vectors for several major arboviruses of public health concern including dengue viruses. The relationships between Aedes infestation and disease transmission are complex wherein the epidemiological dynamics can be difficult to discern because of a lack of robust and sensitive indicators for predicting transmission risk. This study investigates the use of anti-Aedes saliva antibodies as a serological biomarker for Aedes mosquito bites to assess small scale variations in adult Aedes density and dengue virus (DENV) transmission risk in northeastern Thailand. Individual characteristics, behaviors/occupation and socio-demographics, climatic and epidemiological risk factors associated with human-mosquito exposure are also addressed.

methodsThe study was conducted within a randomized clustered control trial in Roi Et and Khon Kaen provinces over a consecutive 19 months period. Thirty-six (36) clusters were selected, each of ten houses. Serological and entomological surveys were conducted in all houses every four months and monthly in three sentinel households per cluster between September 2017 and April 2019 for blood spot collections and recording concurrent immature and adult Aedes indices. Additionally, the human exposure to Aedes mosquito bites (i.e., Mosquito Exposure Index or MEI) was estimated by ELISA measuring levels of human antibody response to the specific Nterm-34 kDa salivary antigen. The relationships between the MEI, vector infestation indices (adult and immature stages) and vector DENV infection were evaluated using a two-level (house and individual levels) mixed model analysis with one-month lag autoregressive correlation.

resultsThere was a strong positive relationship between the MEI and adult Aedes (indoor and outdoor) density. Individuals from households with a medium mosquito density (mean difference: 0.091, p<0.001) and households with a high mosquito density (mean difference: 0.131, p<0.001) had higher MEI's compared to individuals from households without Aedes. On a similar trend, individuals from households with a low, medium or high indoor Aedes densities (mean difference: 0.021, p<0.007, 0.053, p<0.0001 and 0.037, p<0.0001 for low, medium and high levels of infestation, respectively) had higher MEI than individuals from houses without indoor Aedes. The MEI was driven by individual characteristics, such as gender, age and occupation/behaviors, and varied according to climatic, seasonal factors and vector control intervention (p<0.05). Nevertheless, the study did not demonstrate a clear correlation between MEI and the presence of DENV-infected Aedes.

conclusionThis study represents an important step toward the validation of the specific IgG response to the Aedes salivary peptide Nterm-34kDa as a proxy measure for Aedes infestation levels and human-mosquito exposure risk in a dengue endemic setting. The use of the IgG response to the Nterm-34 kDa peptide as a viable diagnostic tool for estimating dengue transmission requires further investigations and validation in other geographical and transmission settings.

Indexed as

AedesAnimalsBiomarkersDengueDengue VirusEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin GInsect Bites and StingsMaleMosquito VectorsSalivaThailandBiomarkersImmunoglobulin G

Identifiers

PMID34043621
PMCPMC8189451
OpenAlexW3165067244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.