Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34043525›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2021

Predictive Monitoring-Impact in Acute Care Cardiology Trial (PM-IMPACCT): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Jessica Keim-Malpass, Sarah J Ratcliffe, Liza P Moorman, Matthew T Clark, Katy N Krahn, Oliver J Monfredi, Susan Hamil, Gholamreza Yousefvand, J Randall Moorman, Jamieson M Bourque

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04359641 (Predictive Monitoring - IMPact in Acute Care Cardiology Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04359641 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Predictive Monitoring - IMPact in Acute Care Cardiology Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorJamieson Bourque, MDRan2021 to 2028Enrolled10,424ConditionsClinical DeteriorationArmsCoMET Display
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica Keim-MalpassUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7035-8556
Sarah J RatcliffeUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6644-8284
Liza P MoormanAMP3D, Charlottesville, VA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2383-9346
Matthew T ClarkAMP3D, Charlottesville, VA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4161-7897
Katy N KrahnUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6259-5906
Oliver J MonfrediUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1292-2902
Susan HamilUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5333-1354
Gholamreza YousefvandUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7352-0221
J Randall MoormanUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5772-1648
Jamieson M BourqueUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0727-199X
University of Virginia · USAmpel BioSolutions (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients in acute care wards who deteriorate and are emergently transferred to intensive care units (ICUs) have poor outcomes. Early identification of patients who are decompensating might allow for earlier clinical intervention and reduced morbidity and mortality. Advances in bedside continuous predictive analytics monitoring (ie, artificial intelligence [AI]-based risk prediction) have made complex data easily available to health care providers and have provided early warning of potentially catastrophic clinical events. We present a dynamic, visual, predictive analytics monitoring tool that integrates real-time bedside telemetric physiologic data into robust clinical models to estimate and communicate risk of imminent events. This tool, Continuous Monitoring of Event Trajectories (CoMET), has been shown in retrospective observational studies to predict clinical decompensation on the acute care ward. There is a need to more definitively study this advanced predictive analytics or AI monitoring system in a prospective, randomized controlled, clinical trial.

objectiveThe goal of this trial is to determine the impact of an AI-based visual risk analytic, CoMET, on improving patient outcomes related to clinical deterioration, response time to proactive clinical action, and costs to the health care system.

methodsWe propose a cluster randomized controlled trial to test the impact of using the CoMET display in an acute care cardiology and cardiothoracic surgery hospital floor. The number of admissions to a room undergoing cluster randomization was estimated to be 10,424 over the 20-month study period. Cluster randomization based on bed number will occur every 2 months. The intervention cluster will have the CoMET score displayed (along with standard of care), while the usual care group will receive standard of care only.

resultsThe primary outcome will be hours free from events of clinical deterioration. Hours of acute clinical events are defined as time when one or more of the following occur: emergent ICU transfer, emergent surgery prior to ICU transfer, cardiac arrest prior to ICU transfer, emergent intubation, or death. The clinical trial began randomization in January 2021.

conclusionsVery few AI-based health analytics have been translated from algorithm to real-world use. This study will use robust, prospective, randomized controlled, clinical trial methodology to assess the effectiveness of an advanced AI predictive analytics monitoring system in incorporating real-time telemetric data for identifying clinical deterioration on acute care wards. This analysis will strengthen the ability of health care organizations to evolve as learning health systems, in which bioinformatics data are applied to improve patient outcomes by incorporating AI into knowledge tools that are successfully integrated into clinical practice by health care providers.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04359641; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04359641. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/29631.

Indexed as

acute careAIartificial intelligencecardiologyclinical deteriorationimpactmonitoringpredictionpredictive analytics monitoringrandomized controlled trialriskrisk estimationvisual analytics

Identifiers

PMID34043525
PMCPMC8285742
OpenAlexW3164480438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.