Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34043414›Full record

ArticleJCO global oncology2021

Locally Advanced Breast Cancer (LABC): Real-World Outcome of Patients From Cancer Institute, Chennai.

Manikandan Dhanushkodi, Velusamy Sridevi, Viswanathan Shanta, Ranganathan Rama, Rajaraman Swaminathan, Ganesarajah Selvaluxmy, Trivadi S Ganesan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO global oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. A study to compare the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 overexpressing breast cancer.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Locally advanced breast cancer.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Manikandan DhanushkodiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8192-3856
Velusamy SrideviDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, India.
Viswanathan ShantaCancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, India.
Ranganathan RamaDepartment of Epidemiology Biostatistics and Tumor Registry, Cancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, India.
Rajaraman SwaminathanDepartment of Epidemiology Biostatistics and Tumor Registry, Cancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, India.
Ganesarajah SelvaluxmyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, India.
Trivadi S GanesanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4671-8099

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere are sparse data on the outcome of patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). This report is on the prognostic factors and long-term outcome from Cancer Institute, Chennai.

methodsThis is an analysis of untreated patients with LABC (stages IIIA-C) who were treated from January 2006 to December 2013.

resultsOf the 4,577 patients with breast cancer who were treated, 2,137 patients (47%) with LABC were included for analysis. The median follow-up was 75 months (range, 1-170 months), and 2.3% (n = 49) were lost to follow-up at 5 years. The initial treatment was neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation (NACR) (77%), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (15%), or others (8%). Patients with triple-negative breast cancer had a pathologic complete response (PCR) of 41%. The 10-year overall survival was for stage IIIA (65.1%), stage IIIB (41.2%), and stage IIIC (26.7%). Recurrence of cancer was observed in 27% of patients (local 13% and distant 87%). Multivariate analysis showed that patients with a tumor size > 10 cm (hazard ratio [HR], 2.19; 95% CI, 1.62 to 2.98;

conclusionNACR was feasible in inoperable LABC and gave satisfactory long-term survival. PCR was significantly higher in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. The tumor size > 10 cm was significantly associated with inferior survival. However, this report acknowledges the limitations inherent in experience of management of LABC from a single center.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIndiaNeoplasm Recurrence, Local

Identifiers

PMID34043414
PMCPMC8457812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.