ArticleJournal of proteome research2021
A Compendium of Murine (Phospho)Peptides Encompassing Different Isobaric Labeling and Data Acquisition Strategies.
Article in Journal of proteome research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enriching Cysteine-Containing Peptides Using a Sulfhydryl-Reactive Alkylating Reagent with a Phosphonic Acid Group and Immobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography.Journal of proteome research · 2023Article
- A multi-purpose, regenerable, proteome-scale, human phosphoserine resource for phosphoproteomics.Nature methods · 2022Article
- Kinase domain autophosphorylation rewires the activity and substrate specificity of CK1 enzymes.Molecular cell · 2022Article
- FeJournal of proteomics · 2022Article
- A highly multiplexed quantitative phosphosite assay for biology and preclinical studies.Molecular systems biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Targeted mass spectrometry-based assays typically rely on previously acquired large data sets for peptide target selection. Such repositories are widely available for unlabeled peptides. However, they are less common for isobaric tagged peptides. Here we have assembled two series of six data sets originating from a mouse embryonic fibroblast cell line (NIH/3T3). One series is of peptides derived from a tryptic digest of a whole cell proteome and a second from enriched phosphopeptides. These data sets encompass three labeling approaches (unlabeled, TMT11-labeled, and TMTpro16-labeled) and two data acquisition strategies (ion trap MS2 with and without FAIMS-based gas phase separation). We identified a total of 1 509 526 peptide-spectrum matches which covered 11 482 proteins from the whole cell proteome tryptic digest, and 188 849 phosphopeptides from the phosphopeptide enrichment. The data sets were of similar depth, and while overlap across data sets was modest, protein overlap was high, thus reinforcing the comprehensiveness of these data sets. The data also supported FAIMS as a means to increase data set depth. These data sets provide a rich resource of peptides that may be used as starting points for targeted assays. Future data sets may be compiled for any genome-sequenced organism using the technologies and strategies highlighted herein. The data have been deposited in the ProteomeXchange Consortium with data set identifier PXD024298.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.