Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34043260›Full record

ReviewBrain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland)2021

MRI and muscle imaging for idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.

Samuel Malartre, Damien Bachasson, Guillaume Mercy, Elissone Sarkis, Céline Anquetil, Olivier Benveniste, Yves Allenbach

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings of presumed limber tail syndrome in a cat.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Samuel MalartreDepartment of Internal Medicine and Clinical Immunlogy, Sorbonne Université, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0712-878X
Damien BachassonNeuromuscular Physiology Laboratory, Neuromuscular Investigation Center, Institute of Myology, Paris, France.
Guillaume MercyDepartment of Medical Imaging, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles-Foix, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Elissone SarkisDepartment of Internal Medicine and Clinical Immunlogy, Sorbonne Université, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France.
Céline AnquetilDepartment of Internal Medicine and Clinical Immunlogy, Sorbonne Université, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France.
Olivier BenvenisteDepartment of Internal Medicine and Clinical Immunlogy, Sorbonne Université, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France.
Yves AllenbachDepartment of Internal Medicine and Clinical Immunlogy, Sorbonne Université, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France.
Inserm · FRInstitut de Myologie · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are a heterogeneous group of diseases nearly all patients display muscle inflammation. Originally, muscle biopsy was considered as the gold standard for IIM diagnosis. The development of muscle imaging led to revisiting not only the IIM diagnosis strategy but also the patients' follow-up. Different techniques have been tested or are in development for IIM including positron emission tomography, ultrasound imaging, ultrasound shear wave elastography, though magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains the most widely used technique in routine. Whereas guidelines on muscle imaging in myositis are lacking here we reviewed the relevance of muscle imaging for both diagnosis and myositis patients' follow-up. We propose recommendations about when and how to perform MRI on myositis patients, and we describe new techniques that are under development.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingBiopsyBrainHumansMuscle, SkeletalMyositisUltrasonographyidiopathic inflammatory myopathiesMRIultra sound imaging

Identifiers

PMID34043260
PMCPMC8412099
OpenAlexW3164657299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.