Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34043256›Full record

ReviewAndrology2021

Use of contrast enhanced ultrasound in testicular diseases: A comprehensive review.

Marta Tenuta, Franz Sesti, Ilaria Bonaventura, Paola Mazzotta, Riccardo Pofi, Daniele Gianfrilli, Carlotta Pozza

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Andrology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Multiparametric Ultrasound Findings of Testicular Sarcoidosis.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Testicular ultrasound: an emergency medicine perspective.Internal and emergency medicine · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marta TenutaDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Franz SestiDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3850-627X
Ilaria BonaventuraDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Paola MazzottaDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Riccardo PofiDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Daniele GianfrilliDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2682-8266
Carlotta PozzaDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1147-6114
Sapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a sonographic technique that increases the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound and color Doppler ultrasound (CDUS) when studying testicular abnormalities. However, its role in clinical practice is still debatable because there are no accepted standards regarding how and when this technique should be used for patients with testicular disease.

objectivesTo perform a nonsystematic review of the current literature to highlight the strength and flaws of performing CEUS and to provide a critical overview of current research evidence on this topic. MATERIALS AND

methodsA thorough search of published peer-reviewed studies in PubMed was performed using proper keywords.

resultsStrong enhancement of neoplastic lesions (both benign and malignant) during CEUS aids in differential diagnosis with non-neoplastic lesions, which usually appears either nonenhanced or enhanced in a manner similar to that of the surrounding parenchyma. CEUS enhancement has a high predictive value in the identification of neoplastic lesions, whereas a similar or complete absence of enhancement may be interpreted as strong evidence of benignity, although there are exceptions. Literature on quantitative analysis is still scarce, though promising, particularly in distinguishing benign from malignant neoplasms. Furthermore, CEUS may be useful in many emergency situations, such as acute scrotum, blunt scrotal trauma, and focal infarction of the testis. Finally, CEUS can help increase the probability of sperm recovery in azoospermic males. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionCEUS is a safe, easy-to-perform, and cost-effective diagnostic tool that can provide a more accurate diagnosis in testicular lesions and acute scrotal disease. However, further studies with larger cohorts are required to refine the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant neoplasms. Finally, these preliminary results can instigate the development of innovative research on pre-testicular sperm extraction to increase the chances of sperm recovery.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansMaleTesticular DiseasesTestisUltrasonographyUltrasonography, Doppler, ColorContrast Mediaacute scrotumCEUSinfertilitytesticular tumortestis

Identifiers

PMID34043256
PMCPMC8640938
OpenAlexW3164383543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.