ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021
Discussion on the existing methodology of entropy-weights in water quality indexing and proposal for a modification of the expected conflicts.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present research focuses on addressing various ambiguities in the existing method of integrating information entropy and water quality, thereby presenting a novel approach for an entropy-weighted water quality index. A three-dimensional water quality dataset is considered in the proposed method, the third dimension being the sampling frequency factor. The probability of observed values adhering to desirable limits prescribed by a standard code is estimated, leading to the computation of information entropy and, eventually, entropy weights. These weights are then used for the computation of the Modified Entropy-weight Water Quality Index (MEWQI) values. To verify the proposed method's applicability, the water quality dataset of Deepor Beel, India, was considered. IS 10500: 2012 was used for estimating MEWQI values. Results showed an excellent correlation with the observed dataset and their uncertainties of occurrence. The reliability and correctness of the proposed methodology were finally confirmed through both cluster analysis and sensitivity analysis. The cluster analysis showed remarkable associations with the computed MEWQI values, while the sensitivity analysis proved that no particular parameter was accountable for the contribution of MEWQI values; instead, all parameters exhibited equal contributions. The proposed methodology was thus found to be the most reasonable and reliable as it considered both factors, i.e., measured values concerning standard limits and the uncertainty, necessary for a consistent water quality monitoring program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34043163What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.