Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34043088›Full record

ArticleDie Naturwissenschaften2021

Do calcium oxalate crystals protect against herbivory?

Élder Antônio Sousa Paiva

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Die Naturwissenschaften, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Élder Antônio Sousa PaivaPlant Secretion & Reproduction (PlantSeR) Lab, Departamento de Botânica, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 31270-901, Brazil. epaiva@icb.ufmg.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1440-4810
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 305638/2018‒1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Calcium oxalate (CaOx) crystals have challenged human curiosity since the advent of microscopy. These crystals are linked to the control of calcium levels in plant cells, but they have also been attributed several other functions, including protection against herbivory. However, the protection offered by CaOx crystals against herbivory may be overstated, as claims have been mainly based on their shapes and hard and indigestible nature rather than on experimental evidence. I contend that it is improbable that a constitutive defense, present since very early in the evolution of plants, has not been superseded by herbivores, especially insects. Here, I present arguments and evidence that suggest that these crystals have low efficiency in protecting plants against herbivores. First, I argue that insects with chewing mouthparts possess a semipermeable structure that protects their midgut, minimizing damage from crystals. Second, the action of CaOx crystals is purely mechanical and similar to other inert materials such as sand. Therefore, CaOx crystals only provide effective protection from herbivory in very particular cases and should not be considered an effective defense without supporting experimental evidence.

Indexed as

HerbivoryAnimalsCalcium OxalateInsectaPlantsCalcium OxalateBiomineralizationCalcium oxalateHerbivoryInsect–plant interactionsPeritrophic matrix

Identifiers

PMID34043088
OpenAlexW3164965894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.