Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34043075›Full record

ArticleBrain structure & function2021

Optic flow selectivity in the macaque parieto-occipital sulcus.

Sabrina Pitzalis, Fadila Hadj-Bouziane, Giulia Dal Bò, Carole Guedj, Francesca Strappini, Martine Meunier, Alessandro Farnè, Patrizia Fattori, Claudio Galletti

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Brain structure & function, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Speed of Optic Flow Stimuli Influences Body Sway.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Sabrina Pitzalis *Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome ''Foro Italico'', Rome, Italy. sabrina.pitzalis@uniroma4.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4445-0391
Fadila Hadj-Bouziane *Integrative Multisensory Perception Action and Cognition Team (ImpAct), INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center (CRNL), Lyon, France.
Giulia Dal BòDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Carole GuedjIntegrative Multisensory Perception Action and Cognition Team (ImpAct), INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center (CRNL), Lyon, France.
Francesca StrappiniDepartment of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
Martine MeunierIntegrative Multisensory Perception Action and Cognition Team (ImpAct), INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center (CRNL), Lyon, France.
Alessandro FarnèIntegrative Multisensory Perception Action and Cognition Team (ImpAct), INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center (CRNL), Lyon, France.
Patrizia FattoriDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0079-3755
Claudio GallettiDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8927-3408
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversity of Bologna · ITForo Italico University of Rome · ITWeizmann Institute of Science · IL

Funding

Foro Italico University of Rome (IT) CDR2.FFABR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In humans, several neuroimaging studies have demonstrated that passive viewing of optic flow stimuli activates higher-level motion areas, like V6 and the cingulate sulcus visual area (CSv). In macaque, there are few studies on the sensitivity of V6 and CSv to egomotion compatible optic flow. The only fMRI study on this issue revealed selectivity to egomotion compatible optic flow in macaque CSv but not in V6 (Cotterau et al. Cereb Cortex 27(1):330-343, 2017, but see Fan et al. J Neurosci. 35:16303-16314, 2015). Yet, it is unknown whether monkey visual motion areas MT + and V6 display any distinctive fMRI functional profile relative to the optic flow stimulation, as it is the case for the homologous human areas (Pitzalis et al., Cereb Cortex 20(2):411-424, 2010). Here, we described the sensitivity of the monkey brain to two motion stimuli (radial rings and flow fields) originally used in humans to functionally map the motion middle temporal area MT + (Tootell et al. J Neurosci 15: 3215-3230, 1995a; Nature 375:139-141, 1995b) and the motion medial parietal area V6 (Pitzalis et al. 2010), respectively. In both animals, we found regions responding only to optic flow or radial rings stimulation, and regions responding to both stimuli. A region in the parieto-occipital sulcus (likely including V6) was one of the most highly selective area for coherently moving fields of dots, further demonstrating the power of this type of stimulation to activate V6 in both humans and monkeys. We did not find any evidence that putative macaque CSv responds to Flow Fields.

Indexed as

Motion PerceptionOptic FlowVisual CortexAnimalsMacacaMagnetic Resonance ImagingPhotic StimulationEgomotionFlow fieldsMonkey fMRIParieto-occipital cortex

Identifiers

PMID34043075
OpenAlexW3164954526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.