Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34043067›Full record

ReviewDer Pathologe2021

[MSI testing : What is new? What should be considered? German version].

Josef Rüschoff, Gustavo Baretton, Hendrik Bläker, Wolfgang Dietmaier, Manfred Dietel, Arndt Hartmann, Lars-Christian Horn, Korinna Jöhrens, Thomas Kirchner, Ruth Knüchel and 8 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Pathologe, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Josef RüschoffInstitut für Pathologie Nordhessen, TARGOS Molecular Pathology GmbH, Germaniastr. 7, 34119, Kassel, Deutschland. josef.rueschoff@targos-gmbh.de.
Gustavo BarettonInstitut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland.
Hendrik BläkerInstitut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstr. 26, Gebäude G, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland.
Wolfgang DietmaierInstitut für Pathologie/Zentrum für molekularpathologische Diagnostik, Universität Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Deutschland.
Manfred DietelInstitut für Pathologie, Campus Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland.
Arndt HartmannPathologisches Institut, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Krankenhausstr. 8-10, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.
Lars-Christian HornInstitut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstr. 26, Gebäude G, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland.
Korinna JöhrensInstitut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland.
Thomas KirchnerPathologisches Institut, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Thalkirchner Str. 36, 80337, München, Deutschland.
Ruth KnüchelInstitut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland.
Doris MayrPathologisches Institut, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Thalkirchner Str. 36, 80337, München, Deutschland.
Sabine Merkelbach-BruseInstitut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.
Hans-Ulrich SchildhausInstitut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Deutschland.
Peter SchirmacherPathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 224, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Markus TiemannInstitut für Hämatopathologie Hamburg, Fangdieckstr. 75a, 22547, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Katharina TiemannInstitut für Hämatopathologie Hamburg, Fangdieckstr. 75a, 22547, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Wilko WeichertInstitut für Pathologie, Technische Universität München, Trogerstr. 18, 81675, München, Deutschland.
Reinhard BüttnerInstitut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.
Institut für Hämatopathologie Hamburg · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversity Hospital Cologne · DEUniversity Hospital Leipzig · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEEssen University Hospital · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEHeidelberg University · DETechnical University of Munich · DEUniversitätsklinikum Aachen · DEUniversity of Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Based on new trial data regarding immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the detection of high-grade microsatellite instability (MSI-H) or underlying deficient mismatch repair protein (dMMR) is now becoming increasingly important for predicting treatment response. For the first time, a PD‑1 ICI (pembrolizumab) has been approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for first-line treatment of advanced (stage IV) dMMR/MSI‑H colorectal cancer (CRC). Further indications, such as dMMR/MSI‑H endometrial carcinoma (EC), have already succeeded (Dostarlimab, 2nd line treatment) and others are expected to follow before the end of 2021. The question of optimal testing in routine diagnostics should therefore be re-evaluated. Based on a consideration of the strengths and weaknesses of the widely available methods (immunohistochemistry and PCR), a test algorithm is proposed that allows quality assured, reliable, and cost-effective dMMR/MSI‑H testing. For CRC and EC, testing is therefore already possible at the primary diagnosis stage, in line with international recommendations (NICE, NCCN). The clinician is therefore enabled from the outset to consider not only the predictive but also the prognostic and predispositional implications of such a test when counseling patients and formulating treatment recommendations. As a basis for quality assurance, participation in interlaboratory comparisons and continuous documentation of results (e.g., QuIP Monitor) are strongly recommended.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsMicrosatellite InstabilityDNA Mismatch RepairHumansImmunohistochemistryPrognosisDNA mismatch repairEndometrial carcinomaImmune checkpoint inhibitorsMicrosatellite instabilityPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID34043067
OpenAlexW3165623316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.