ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2022
Same-day surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and hospital contact within 30 days.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07768878 (Enhanced Recovery After Urogynaecological Surgery - Early Urinary Catheter Removal in an Asian Population), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Enhanced Recovery After Urogynaecological Surgery - Early Urinary Catheter Removal in an Asian Population
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perioperative Interventions to Facilitate Day-Case Vaginal Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review.International urogynecology journal · 2026Review
- Harmful incidents following gynaecological ambulatory surgery: A scoping review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Review
- Evaluating the association of same-day discharge following minimally invasive surgery for prolapse on 30-day postoperative adverse events.International urogynecology journal · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisThe practice of same-day surgery among urogynecologic surgeons is increasing worldwide, but the percentage fluctuates among nations. Our primary aim was to investigate the feasibility of same-day surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) using native tissue repair and the reasons why same-day surgery was not possible. Secondarily, we aimed to investigate the cause of hospital contact within 30 days post surgery.
methodsThis is a case-control study including 803 women who underwent POP surgery performed by vaginal approach intended as same-day surgery during a 3-year period. No patients were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups: successful same-day surgery (SDSS) and same-day surgery failure (SDSF).
resultsSame-day surgery was performed successfully in 90.7% of the cases. Postoperative complications were the main cause of SDSF (76.0%), and most were caused by voiding dysfunction (VD) (42.7%). Patients receiving surgery in the apical compartment and/or surgery involving two compartments, receiving general anesthesia or having comorbidities equivalent to ASA score 3 had a greater tendency not to be able to complete same-day surgery. Regarding telephone contact with the hospital, the SDSS group was significantly less likely to call compared to the SDSF group (11.3% versus 26.7%) (p < 0.01) and the same regarding physical attendance in the department (8.9% and 24.0%) (p < 0.01). Only five patients were re-operated within 30 days because of bleeding.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that same-day surgery for POP has high feasibility and is safe. Complications, hospitalizations and reoperations immediately after surgery and within 30 days were found to be minimal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.