Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34042606›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2021

Intention to Use Behavioral Health Data From a Health Information Exchange: Mixed Methods Study.

Randyl A Cochran, Sue S Feldman, Nataliya V Ivankova, Allyson G Hall, William Opoku-Agyeman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Randyl A CochranDepartment of Health Sciences, College of Health Professions, Towson University, Towson, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4806-4084
Sue S FeldmanDepartment of Health Services Administration, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1173-3993
Nataliya V IvankovaDepartment of Health Services Administration, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5742-7035
Allyson G HallDepartment of Health Services Administration, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4945-9184
William Opoku-AgyemanSchool of Health and Applied Human Sciences, College of Health and Human Services, University of North Carolina Wilmington, Wilmington, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2816-4598

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with co-occurring behavioral health and chronic medical conditions frequently overuse inpatient hospital services. This pattern of overuse contributes to inefficient health care spending. These patients require coordinated care to achieve optimal health outcomes. However, the poor exchange of health-related information between various clinicians renders the delivery of coordinated care challenging. Health information exchanges (HIEs) facilitate health-related information sharing and have been shown to be effective in chronic disease management; however, their effectiveness in the delivery of integrated care is less clear. It is prudent to consider new approaches to sharing both general medical and behavioral health information.

objectiveThis study aims to identify and describe factors influencing the intention to use behavioral health information that is shared through HIEs.

methodsWe used a mixed methods design consisting of two sequential phases. A validated survey instrument was emailed to clinical and nonclinical staff in Alabama and Oklahoma. The survey captured information about the impact of predictors on the intention to use behavioral health data in clinical decision making. Follow-up interviews were conducted with a subsample of participants to elaborate on the survey results. Partial least squares structural equation modeling was used to analyze survey data. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes from the interviews.

resultsA total of 62 participants completed the survey. In total, 63% (n=39) of the participants were clinicians. Performance expectancy (β=.382; P=.01) and trust (β=.539; P<.001) predicted intention to use behavioral health information shared via HIEs. The interviewees (n=5) expressed that behavioral health information could be useful in clinical decision making. However, privacy and confidentiality concerns discourage sharing this information, which is generally missing from patient records altogether. The interviewees also stated that training for HIE use was not mandatory; the training that was provided did not focus specifically on the exchange of behavioral health information.

conclusionsDespite barriers, individuals are willing to use behavioral health information from HIEs if they believe that it will enhance job performance and if the information being transmitted is trustworthy. The findings contribute to our understanding of the role HIEs can play in delivering integrated care, particularly to vulnerable patients.

Indexed as

behavioral healthbehavioral intentionhealth information exchangeintegrated caremixed methods researchpatient care

Identifiers

PMID34042606
PMCPMC8193493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.