Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34042595›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2021

Recorded Mental Health Recovery Narratives as a Resource for People Affected by Mental Health Problems: Development of the Narrative Experiences Online (NEON) Intervention.

Mike Slade, Stefan Rennick-Egglestone, Joy Llewellyn-Beardsley, Caroline Yeo, James Roe, Sylvia Bailey, Roger Andrew Smith, Susie Booth, Julian Harrison, Adaresh Bhogal and 16 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Digital narratology for people with psychosis experience.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Mike Slade *School of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7020-3434
Stefan Rennick-Egglestone *School of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4187-011X
Joy Llewellyn-BeardsleySchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0525-6358
Caroline YeoSchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3399-4729
James RoeNational Institute for Health Research, ARC East Midlands, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9514-5629
Sylvia BaileyNEON Lived Experience Advisory Panel, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3633-0576
Roger Andrew SmithNEON Lived Experience Advisory Panel, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9287-6581
Susie BoothNEON Lived Experience Advisory Panel, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1131-1739
Julian HarrisonNEON Lived Experience Advisory Panel, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4868-2605
Adaresh BhogalNEON Lived Experience Advisory Panel, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Patricia Penas MoránDepartment of Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatment, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9275-7654
Ada HuiSchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7416-046X
Dania QuadriGKT School of Medical Education, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8710-9337
Clare RobinsonCentre for Primary Care & Public Health, Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2673-2205
Melanie SmukDepartment of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1594-1458
Marianne FarkasCollege of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6027-0382
Larry DavidsonYale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1183-8047
Lian van der KriekeUniversity Medical Center Groningen, University Center of Psychiatry, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6745-5913
Emily SladeDepartment of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6794-5461
Carmel BondNottingham University Business School, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9945-8577
Joe NicholsonSchool of Humanities, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4220-9393
Andrew GrundySchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6562-6894
Ashleigh CharlesSchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2222-4358
Laurie Hare-DukeSchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2145-4557
Kristian PollockSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6836-8595
Fiona NgSchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8656-8830
University of Nottingham · GBBoston University · USKing's College London · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversidad de Deusto · ESUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Oxford · GBYale University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe internet enables sharing of narratives about health concerns on a substantial scale, and some digital health narratives have been integrated into digital health interventions. Narratives describing recovery from health problems are a focus of research, including those presented in recorded (eg, invariant) form. No clinical trial has been conducted on a web-based intervention providing access to a collection of Recorded Recovery Narratives (RRNs).

objectiveThis study presents knowledge produced through the development of the Narrative Experiences Online (NEON) Intervention, a web-based intervention incorporating the algorithmic recommendation of RRNs.

methodsKnowledge was gathered through knowledge integration (KI) activities. KI1 synthesized previous studies to produce the NEON Impact Model describing how accessing RRNs produces health-related outcomes. KI2 developed curation principles for the NEON Collection of RRNs through consultation with the NEON Lived Experience Advisory Panel and the curation of a preliminary collection. KI3 identified harm minimization strategies for the NEON Intervention through consultation with the NEON International Advisory Board and Lived Experience Advisory Panel. The NEON Intervention was finalized through 2 research studies (RS). In RS1, mental health service users (N=40) rated the immediate impact of randomly presented narratives to validate narrative feedback questions used to inform the recommendation algorithm. In RS2, mental health service users (n=25) were interviewed about their immediate response to a prototype of the NEON Intervention and trial procedures and then were interviewed again after 1 month of use. The usability and acceptability of the prototype and trial procedures were evaluated and refinements were made.

resultsKI1 produced the NEON Impact Model, which identifies moderators (recipient and context), mechanisms of connection (reflection, comparison, learning, and empathy), processes (identification of change from narrative structure or content and internalization of observed change), and outcomes (helpful and unhelpful). KI2 identified 22 curation principles, including a mission to build a large, heterogeneous collection to maximize opportunities for connection. KI3 identified seven harm minimization strategies, including content warnings, proactive and reactive blocking of narratives, and providing resources for the self-management of emotional distress. RS1 found variation in the impact of narratives on different participants, indicating that participant-level feedback on individual narratives is needed to inform a recommender system. The order of presentation did not predict narrative feedback. RS2 identified amendments to web-based trial procedures and the NEON Intervention. Participants accessed some narratives multiple times, use reduced over the 4-week period, and narrative feedback was provided for 31.8% (105/330) of narrative accesses.

conclusionsRRNs can be integrated into web-based interventions. Evaluating the NEON Intervention in a clinical trial is feasible. The mixed methods design for developing the NEON Intervention can guide its extension to other clinical populations, the design of other web-based mental health interventions, and the development of narrative-based interventions in mental health.

Indexed as

internetintervention developmentmental healthmobile phonenarrative medicinenarrativesonline interventionpatient involvementrecoverystorytelling

Identifiers

PMID34042595
PMCPMC8193481
OpenAlexW3165758083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.