Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34042188›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2021

Clinical assessment of a biophysical model for distinguishing tumor progression from radiation necrosis.

Ammoren E Dohm, Tanner M Nickles, Caroline E Miller, Haley J Bowers, Michael I Miga, Albert Attia, Michael D Chan, Jared A Weis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Mechanistic Model of Brain Necrosis Progression Based on Vascular Heterogeneity.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2026
    Article
  2. Computational Modeling and AI in Radiation Neuro-Oncology and Radiosurgery.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ammoren E DohmDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Tanner M NicklesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Caroline E MillerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Haley J BowersDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Michael I MigaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Albert AttiaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Michael D ChanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Jared A WeisDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.

Funding

Tumor Tissue CoreP30CA012197 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Ruben A. Mesa · 1985 to 2026
$55.4M
Multi-Scale Biomechanical Modeling of Tumor Growth and Response in Breast CancerK25CA204599 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WEIS, JARED ANTHONY · 2016 to 2020
$747k
National Institutes of Health-National Cancer Institute K25CA204599National Institutes of Health-National Cancer Institute P30CA012197National Science Foundation Research Experiences for Undergraduates 1559700NCI NIH HHS K25 CA204599NCI NIH HHS P30 CA012197
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe efficacy of an imaging-driven mechanistic biophysical model of tumor growth for distinguishing radiation necrosis from tumor progression in patients with enhancing lesions following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastasis is validated.

methodsWe retrospectively assessed the model using 73 patients with 78 lesions and histologically confirmed radiation necrosis or tumor progression. Postcontrast T1-weighted MRI images were used to extract parameters for a mechanistic reaction-diffusion logistic growth model mechanically coupled to the surrounding tissue. The resulting model was then used to estimate mechanical stress fields, which were then compared with edema visualized on FLAIR imaging using DICE similarity coefficients. DICE, model, and standard radiographic morphometric analysis parameters were evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for prediction of radiation necrosis or tumor progression. Multivariate logistic regression models were then constructed using mechanistic model parameters or advanced radiomic features. An independent validation was performed to evaluate predictive performance.

resultsTumor cell proliferation rate resulted in ROC AUC = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.76-0.95, P < 0.0001, 74% sensitivity and 95% specificity) and DICE similarity coefficient associated with high stresses demonstrated an ROC AUC = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.86-0.99, P < 0.0001, 81% sensitivity and 95% specificity. In a multivariate logistic regression model using an independent validation dataset, mechanistic modeling parameters had an ROC AUC of 0.95, with 94% sensitivity and 96% specificity.

conclusionsImaging-driven biophysical modeling of tumor growth represents a novel method for accurately predicting clinically significant tumor behavior.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsRadiation InjuriesRadiosurgeryHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNecrosisRetrospective StudiesROC Curvebrain metastasiscomputational modelradiation necrosisstereotactic radiosurgerytumor progression

Identifiers

PMID34042188
PMCPMC8319112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.