Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34041845›Full record

ReviewEMBO reports2021

Putting the brakes on phagocytosis: "don't-eat-me" signaling in physiology and disease.

Shannon M Kelley, Kodi S Ravichandran

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EMBO reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Lipid-Facilitated Opening of the ADAM10 Sheddase Revealed by Enhanced Sampling Simulations.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. CD47 Promotes, While Exposure to Apoptotic Cells Destroys the Fusion Program of Differentiating Myoblasts.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  10. More Than a Cleanup Crew: The Expanding Biology of Efferocytosis.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shannon M KelleyCenter for Cell Clearance, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0381-2050
Kodi S RavichandranCenter for Cell Clearance, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9049-1410

Funding

Role of Pannexins in Vascular Smooth Muscle CellsP01HL120840 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI BAYLISS, DOUGLAS A., RAVICHANDRAN, KODI S · 2014 to 2023
$24.0M
INTERDISCIPLINARY TRAINING PROGRAM IN IMMUNOLOGYT32AI007496 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI Michael G. Brown, Coleen A McNamara · 1995 to 2026
$10.2M
Solute carrier proteins in efferocytosis and inflammationR01AI159551 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI RAVICHANDRAN, KODI S · 2021 to 2025
$2.9M
Mechanisms regulating apoptotic cell clearance in health and diseaseR35GM122542 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI RAVICHANDRAN, KODI S · 2017 to 2021
$2.3M
Solute carrier proteins and metal ion-based signaling during efferocytosisR37AI159551 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Kodi S Ravichandran · 2026 to 2026
$611k
HHS | NIH | National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) 120840NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL120840NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI159551NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI159551NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007496NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM122542
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Timely removal of dying or pathogenic cells by phagocytes is essential to maintaining host homeostasis. Phagocytes execute the clearance process with high fidelity while sparing healthy neighboring cells, and this process is at least partially regulated by the balance of "eat-me" and "don't-eat-me" signals expressed on the surface of host cells. Upon contact, eat-me signals activate "pro-phagocytic" receptors expressed on the phagocyte membrane and signal to promote phagocytosis. Conversely, don't-eat-me signals engage "anti-phagocytic" receptors to suppress phagocytosis. We review the current knowledge of don't-eat-me signaling in normal physiology and disease contexts where aberrant don't-eat-me signaling contributes to pathology.

Indexed as

Biological PhenomenaPhagocytosisApoptosisPhagocytesSignal Transductionanti-phagocytic receptor‘don't-eat-me’efferocytosisITIMphagocytosis

Identifiers

PMID34041845
PMCPMC8183410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.