Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34041724›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of dentistry2021

Effect of Modeling Resins on Microhardness of Resin Composites.

Ezgi T Bayraktar, Pinar Y Atali, Bora Korkut, Ezgi G Kesimli, Bilge Tarcin, Cafer Turkmen

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05801458 (Evaluation of Resin Composite Posterior Restorations Using Modeling Resin Insertion Technique Versus Conventional Composite Placement Technique in Class I Lesions), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05801458 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Resin Composite Posterior Restorations Using Modeling Resin Insertion Technique Versus Conventional Composite Placement Technique in Class I Lesions: Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled50ConditionsClass I Composite RestorationsArmsModeling Resin Insertion Technique, Conventional resin composite Incremental Placement Technique
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Assessment of Monomer Release From Resin Composites Following the Use of Various Modeling Liquids.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Influence of Modeling Liquid on Microhardness of Single-Shade Composite Resins: AnJournal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ezgi T BayraktarDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Pinar Y AtaliDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Bora KorkutDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ezgi G KesimliDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Bilge TarcinDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Cafer TurkmenDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study was aimed to determine the effects of modeling resins on the surface microhardness of composites. MATERIALS AND

methodsSix resin-based composites (Charisma Smart, Estellite Asteria, CeramX-One SphereTEC, Admira Fusion, Filtek Ultimate, and Clearfil Majesty Es-2) and three wetting agents (Modeling Liquid, Composite Primer, and Modeling Resin) were investigated. In all, 240 specimens were prepared, and wetting agents were applied prior to light curing in the experimental groups. After 24 hours, specimens were polished and Vickers microhardness (VHN) values were measured. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Shapiro-Wilk and two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used for analyses (

resultsBoth modeling resin and composites were determined to be effective factors (

conclusionAll tested modeling resins decreased VHN value, and the amount of reduction varied among composites and wetting agents. It might be safer not to use wetting agents unless they are necessary.

Identifiers

PMID34041724
PMCPMC8382460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.