Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34041714›Full record

ArticleClinical pharmacokinetics2021

Drug Clearance in Neonates: A Combination of Population Pharmacokinetic Modelling and Machine Learning Approaches to Improve Individual Prediction.

Bo-Hao Tang, Zheng Guan, Karel Allegaert, Yue-E Wu, Efthymios Manolis, Stephanie Leroux, Bu-Fan Yao, Hai-Yan Shi, Xiao Li, Xin Huang and 24 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Predicting Pharmacokinetics of Drugs Using Artificial Intelligence Tools: A Systematic Review.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Rising Role of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Pharmacometrics and Model-Informed Precision Dosing in Pediatrics.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

34 authors at 18 institutions in 11 countries.

Bo-Hao Tang *Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology (Ministry of Education), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, People's Republic of China.
Zheng Guan *Centre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Karel AllegaertDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Yue-E WuDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology (Ministry of Education), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, People's Republic of China.
Efthymios ManolisModelling and Simulation Working Party, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Stephanie LerouxDepartment of Pediatrics, CHU de Rennes, Rennes, France.
Bu-Fan YaoDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology (Ministry of Education), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, People's Republic of China.
Hai-Yan ShiDepartment of Pharmacy, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, People's Republic of China.
Xiao LiDepartment of Pharmacy, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, People's Republic of China.
Xin HuangDepartment of Pharmacy, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, People's Republic of China.
Wen-Qi WangClinical Research Center, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, People's Republic of China.
A-Dong ShenKey Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children and National Key Discipline of Pediatrics (Capital Medical University), Ministry of Education, Beijing Pediatric Research Institute, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Xiao-Ling WangClinical Research Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Tian-You WangClinical Research Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Chen KouDepartment of Neonatology, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Hai-Yan XuDepartment of Pediatrics, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, People's Republic of China.
Yue ZhouDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology (Ministry of Education), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, People's Republic of China.
Yi ZhengDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology (Ministry of Education), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, People's Republic of China.
Guo-Xiang HaoDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology (Ministry of Education), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, People's Republic of China.
Bao-Ping XuDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Alison H ThomsonStrathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
Edmund V CapparelliPediatric Pharmacology and Drug Discovery, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
Valerie BiranNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Robert Debre, Paris, France.
Nicolas SimonAix Marseille Univ, APHM, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Hop Sainte Marguerite, Service de Pharmacologie Clinique, CAP-TV, Marseille, France.
Bernd MeibohmDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
Yoke-Lin LoDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Remedios MarquesDepartment of Pharmacy Services, La Fe Hospital, Valencia, Spain.
Jose-Esteban PerisDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Irja LutsarInstitute of Medical Microbiology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Jumpei SaitoDepartment of Pharmacy, National Children's Hospital National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Jacobus BurggraafCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Evelyne Jacqz-AigrainDepartment of Pediatric Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Hospital Robert Debre, APHP, Paris, France.
John van den AnkerDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Wei ZhaoDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology (Ministry of Education), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, People's Republic of China. zhao4wei2@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1830-338X
Shandong University · CNCapital Medical University · CNShandong Provincial QianFoShan Hospital · CNEuropean Medicines Agency · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes · FRChildren's National · USDélégation Paris 7 · FRHôpital Robert-Debré · FRInserm · FRKU Leuven · BENational Center For Child Health and Development · JPUniversitat de València · ESUniversity of California San Diego · USUniversity of Malaya · MYUniversity of Strathclyde · GBUniversity of Tartu · EEUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University FCYY201715National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant 81803433National Science and Technology Major Projects for Major New Drugs Innovation and Development 2017ZX09304029-001National Science and Technology Major Projects for Major New Drugs Innovation and Development 2017ZX09304029-002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPopulation pharmacokinetic evaluations have been widely used in neonatal pharmacokinetic studies, while machine learning has become a popular approach to solving complex problems in the current era of big data.

objectiveThe aim of this proof-of-concept study was to evaluate whether combining population pharmacokinetic and machine learning approaches could provide a more accurate prediction of the clearance of renally eliminated drugs in individual neonates.

methodsSix drugs that are primarily eliminated by the kidneys were selected (vancomycin, latamoxef, cefepime, azlocillin, ceftazidime, and amoxicillin) as 'proof of concept' compounds. Individual estimates of clearance obtained from population pharmacokinetic models were used as reference clearances, and diverse machine learning methods and nested cross-validation were adopted and evaluated against these reference clearances. The predictive performance of these combined methods was compared with the performance of two other predictive methods: a covariate-based maturation model and a postmenstrual age and body weight scaling model. Relative error was used to evaluate the different methods.

resultsThe extra tree regressor was selected as the best-fit machine learning method. Using the combined method, more than 95% of predictions for all six drugs had a relative error of < 50% and the mean relative error was reduced by an average of 44.3% and 71.3% compared with the other two predictive methods.

conclusionA combined population pharmacokinetic and machine learning approach provided improved predictions of individual clearances of renally cleared drugs in neonates. For a new patient treated in clinical practice, individual clearance can be predicted a priori using our model code combined with demographic data.

Indexed as

Drug Elimination RoutesModels, BiologicalHumansInfant, NewbornMachine LearningMetabolic Clearance RateVancomycinVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID34041714
OpenAlexW3164138694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.