Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34041675›Full record

ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2021

Hepatic sclerosed hemangioma and sclerosing cavernous hemangioma: a radiological study.

Cuiyu Jia, Guangxue Liu, Xinxin Wang, Dawei Zhao, Ruili Li, Hongjun Li

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Current State of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Applications for Head and Neck MR Imaging.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Multiple sclerosing hemangiomas mimicking hepatocellular carcinoma: A case report.International journal of immunopathology and pharmacology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cuiyu Jia *Department of Radiology, Beijing YouAn Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100069, China. jiacuiyu@ccmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5203-4865
Guangxue Liu *Department of Natural Medicines, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, 100191, China.
Xinxin WangDepartment of Pathology, Beijing YouAn Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100069, China.
Dawei ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, Beijing YouAn Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100069, China.
Ruili LiDepartment of Radiology, Beijing YouAn Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100069, China. 1985lrli@ccmu.edu.cn.
Hongjun LiDepartment of Radiology, Beijing YouAn Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100069, China. lihongjun00113@ccmu.edu.cn.
Capital Medical University · CNPeking University · CN

Funding

Capital Medical University Research and Incubation Funding No. PYZ2017124National Natural Science Foundation of China 61936013National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 81771806Peking University Medicine Seed Fund for Interdisciplinary Research No. BMU2018MX027Project of Incubating Young and Middle-aged Talents No. YNKTTS20180130
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate and compare the CT and MRI features of hepatic sclerosed hemangioma (HSH) and sclerosing cavernous hemangioma (SCH). MATERIALS AND

methodsTwelve HSH cases and 36 SCH cases were included, the imaging findings on CT (9 HSH and 34 SCH) and MRI (8 HSH and 10 SCH) were analyzed. Qualitative image analysis included the location, size, shape, capsular retraction, density, calcification, signal intensity on T

resultsThe presence of liver cirrhosis in patients with HSH (3/12) was higher than SCH (1/36) (P = 0.043). The morphology appearance before enhancement showed no significant difference between HSH and SCH. Moreover, SCH had a stronger trend of centripetal enhancement patterns of cavernous hemangiomas (83.3%) compared to HSH (25%) (P < 0.001). Due to more frequent atypical enhancement features, containing rim-like enhancement, no enhancement, and peripheral heterogeneous enhancement, the misdiagnosis rate of HSH (75%) was significantly higher than that of SCH (16.7%) (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the ADC values of HSH and SCH were both higher than that of the surrounding liver parenchyma (P = 0.009, P = 0.002); however, there was no significant difference in ADC values between themselves (P = 0.613).

conclusionSCH showed the same trend of centripetal enhancement characteristics as typical hemangioma, while HSH exhibited atypical enhancement features due to complete sclerosis. Higher ADC values might contribute to the identification of atypical HSH and SCH from malignancies.

Indexed as

HemangiomaHemangioma, CavernousLiver NeoplasmsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingSclerosisComputed tomographyDiagnosisHepatic sclerosed hemangiomaMagnetic resonance imagingSclerosing cavernous hemangioma

Identifiers

PMID34041675
PMCPMC8568860
OpenAlexW3164681692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.