ArticleMikrochimica acta2021
Calibration curve-free electrochemical quantitation by micro-nano multi-scale gap devices.
Article in Mikrochimica acta, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quantitation without relying on the calibration curve has long been an issue of overcoming analytical problems accompanied with the inherent limitations of the calibration curve fitting errors. Here, we report on a calibration curve-free method for electrochemical quantitation based on a multi-scale gap device (MGD). The MGD is an integrated device having a series of interdigitated electrodes (IDE) with micro-to-nano gap distances. The device shows a gap-dependent redox current of the analyte when subjected to the electrochemical cycling between the two facing electrodes of its componential IDEs. Based on the fact that the current increases as the gap distance decreases, the analyte concentration could be directly estimated: the rate of increase in the current was directly proportional to the analyte concentration. The calibration curve was not necessary for the quantitation. The accuracy of this MGD approach was better than that of an IDE collection of the same gap distance, which was deteriorated at the larger gap distances particularly. The MGD-based quantitation of dopamine, potassium ferricyanide, and aminophenol was demonstrated in a relatively broad range of concentrations (100 nM-5 mM).
Indexed as
Identifiers
34041606What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.