Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34041571›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

Comparison of Inline R2* MRI versus FerriScan for liver iron quantification in patients on chelation therapy for iron overload: preliminary results.

Gerard M Healy, Stephan A R Kannengiesser, Osvaldo Espin-Garcia, Richard Ward, Kevin H M Kuo, Kartik S Jhaveri

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Gerard M HealyJoint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital, and Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Stephan A R KannengiesserMR Application Development, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany.
Osvaldo Espin-GarciaDepartment of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Richard WardDivision of Medical Oncology & Hematology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kevin H M KuoDivision of Medical Oncology & Hematology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kartik S JhaveriJoint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital, and Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. Kartik.jhaveri@uhn.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0938-0321
University Health Network · CAMount Sinai Hospital · CASiemens Healthineers (Germany) · DEUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

CSRD VA 1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMRI quantification of liver iron concentration (LIC) using R

methodsForty patients (25 women, 15 men; age 18-82 years), prospectively underwent FerriScan and the prototype sequence, which produces two R

resultsInline R

conclusionInline R KEY POINTS: • In patients being treated for iron overload with chelation therapy, liver iron concentration (LIC) is regularly assessed in order to monitor and adjust therapy. • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is commonly used to quantify LIC. Several R

Indexed as

IronIron OverloadAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChelation TherapyFemaleHumansLiverMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultIronChelation therapyIron metabolism disordersIron overloadLiverMagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID34041571
OpenAlexW3165617359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.