Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34041484›Full record

ReviewRSC medicinal chemistry2020

Fragment-based drug discovery: opportunities for organic synthesis.

Jeffrey D St Denis, Richard J Hall, Christopher W Murray, Tom D Heightman, David C Rees

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC medicinal chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Drug Discovery Strategies for Kallikrein-Related Peptidases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Photochemical Conversion of Indazoles into Benzimidazoles.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Special Issue "Advances in Drug Discovery and Synthesis".International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  13. Fragment-based drug discovery: A graphical review.Current research in pharmacology and drug discovery · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jeffrey D St DenisAstex Pharmaceuticals 436 Cambridge Science Park Cambridge CB4 0QA UK jeff.stdenis@astx.com david.rees@astx.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8653-6644
Richard J HallAstex Pharmaceuticals 436 Cambridge Science Park Cambridge CB4 0QA UK jeff.stdenis@astx.com david.rees@astx.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8578-9458
Christopher W MurrayAstex Pharmaceuticals 436 Cambridge Science Park Cambridge CB4 0QA UK jeff.stdenis@astx.com david.rees@astx.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3733-0700
Tom D HeightmanAstex Pharmaceuticals 436 Cambridge Science Park Cambridge CB4 0QA UK jeff.stdenis@astx.com david.rees@astx.com.
David C ReesAstex Pharmaceuticals 436 Cambridge Science Park Cambridge CB4 0QA UK jeff.stdenis@astx.com david.rees@astx.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This Review describes the increasing demand for organic synthesis to facilitate fragment-based drug discovery (FBDD), focusing on polar, unprotected fragments. In FBDD, X-ray crystal structures are used to design target molecules for synthesis with new groups added onto a fragment

Identifiers

PMID34041484
PMCPMC8130625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.