Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34041429›Full record

ArticleAEM education and training2021

The Ultrasound Competency Assessment Tool (UCAT): Development and Evaluation of a Novel Competency-based Assessment Tool for Point-of-care Ultrasound.

Colin Bell, Andrew K Hall, Natalie Wagner, Louise Rang, Joseph Newbigging, Conor McKaigney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AEM education and training, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Teaching point-of-care ultrasound in a rural family medicine residency.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. ULTRA-Metrics: Delphi-Derived Framework for Assessing Ultrasound Competency.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Colin BellDepartment of Emergency Medicine Queen's University Kingston Ontario Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6416-8537
Andrew K HallDepartment of Emergency Medicine Queen's University Kingston Ontario Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1227-5397
Natalie WagnerDepartment of Biomedical & Molecular Sciences Queen's University Kingston Ontario Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0270-2164
Louise RangDepartment of Emergency Medicine Queen's University Kingston Ontario Canada.
Joseph NewbiggingDepartment of Emergency Medicine Queen's University Kingston Ontario Canada.
Conor McKaigneyDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPoint-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has become an integral diagnostic and interventional tool. Barriers to POCUS training persist, and it continues to remain heterogeneous across training programs. Structured POCUS assessment tools exist, but remain limited in their feasibility, acceptability, reliability, and validity; none of these tools are entrustment-based. The objective of this study was to derive a simple, entrustment-based POCUS competency assessment tool and pilot it in an assessment setting.

methodsThis study was composed of two phases. First, a three-step modified Delphi design surveyed 60 members of the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians Emergency Ultrasound Committee (EUC) to derive the anchors for the tool. Subsequently, the derived ultrasound competency assessment tool (UCAT) was used to assess trainee (

resultsThe three-round Delphi had 22, 26, and 26 responses from the EUC members. Consensus was reached, and anchors for the domains of preparation, image acquisition, image optimization, and clinical integration achieved approval rates between 92 and 96%. The UCAT pilot revealed excellent inter-rater reliability (with ICC values of 0.69-0.89; p

conclusionsWe developed and successfully piloted the UCAT, an entrustment-based bedside POCUS competency assessment tool suitable for rapid deployment. The findings from this study indicate early validity evidence for the use of the UCAT as an assessment of trainee POCUS competence on FAST. The UCAT should be trialed in different populations performing several POCUS study types.

Identifiers

PMID34041429
PMCPMC8138101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.