Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34041378›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2021

Twitter usage during global pandemic and corporate reputation in Nigeria.

Mary Adelua, Tunji Oyedepo, Odion Odiboh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mary AdeluaDepartment of Mass Communication, Covenant University, Ota, Nigeria.
Tunji OyedepoDepartment of Mass Communication, Covenant University, Ota, Nigeria.
Odion OdibohDepartment of Mass Communication, Covenant University, Ota, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study is a meta-analysis of empirical studies in social media strategies and reputation research. The research goal is to give a clearer idea of the broad directions and paradigm shifts in Twitter usage discourse over the years. Its major goal is to examine thematic trends, theoretical framework and methodology that have characterized the discourse. Sixty relevant articles were identified, coded and content-analyzed. Findings revealed that dominant themes include stakeholder perceptions of communication strategies, social network sites, dynamics of global pandemic (i.e Covid-19 pandemic) and corporate reputation. Also, experiment, case study and survey are the dominant research methods that characterize research in this discourse. Findings also revealed large domination of the Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT) and the Image Repair Theory. However, research in this area lacks significant empirical evidence from Africa and Nigeria in particular, where the global pandemic seems to be a recurring phenomenon. The majority of the reviewed journal articles were conducted in the Western clime, with little attention on Africa. Scholarship needs to move beyond this point to provide a holistic and balanced view on the crisis by exploring cases in Africa and particularly, in Nigeria. This gap will provide an opportunity for understanding the global pandemic (i.e. Covid-19) dynamics in Africa and will further determine whether findings can be consistent across the world.

Indexed as

CommunicationGlobal pandemicMethodological trendsReputationStakeholder perceptions

Identifiers

PMID34041378
PMCPMC8141885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.