Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34041349›Full record

ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2021

A user-friendly decision support tool to assist one-health risk assessors.

Rob Dewar, Christine Gavin, Catherine McCarthy, Rachel A Taylor, Charlotte Cook, Robin R L Simons

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rob DewarAnimal and Plant Health Agency, Woodham Lane, Addlestone, KT15 3NB, United Kingdom.
Christine GavinAnimal and Plant Health Agency, Woodham Lane, Addlestone, KT15 3NB, United Kingdom.
Catherine McCarthyAnimal and Plant Health Agency, Woodham Lane, Addlestone, KT15 3NB, United Kingdom.
Rachel A TaylorAnimal and Plant Health Agency, Woodham Lane, Addlestone, KT15 3NB, United Kingdom.
Charlotte CookAnimal and Plant Health Agency, Woodham Lane, Addlestone, KT15 3NB, United Kingdom.
Robin R L SimonsAnimal and Plant Health Agency, Woodham Lane, Addlestone, KT15 3NB, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One-Health risk assessments are integral to developing efficient responses to disease threats, including global pandemics. However, short timeframes, inadequate disease-specific information and an insufficient skill-base make it hard for inexperienced assessors to distinguish between a large portfolio of approaches. The wrong choice can detract from the disease response. Here, we present an interactive decision support tool to help with this choice. A workshop with participants from diverse professional backgrounds provided six themes that should be considered when deciding on the best approach. Questions based on these themes were then developed to populate a decision tree which guides users to their most appropriate approach. One-Health risk assessment tools and literature were used as examples of the different approaches. The tool provides links to these examples and short descriptions of the approaches. Answers are easily changed, facilitating exploration though different approaches. The simple data structure of the tool means it is easy to update with more resources and approaches. It provides a valuable source of guidance and information for less experienced risk assessors.

Indexed as

Decision treeOnlineResourcesUser interfaceWorkshopZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID34041349
PMCPMC8141943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.