Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34041347›Full record

ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2021

A one health glossary to support communication and information exchange between the human health, animal health and food safety sectors.

Tasja Buschhardt, Taras Günther, Taran Skjerdal, Mia Torpdahl, Jörn Gethmann, Maria-Eleni Filippitzi, Catharina Maassen, Solveig Jore, Johanne Ellis-Iversen, Matthias Filter and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A One Health Perspective onMicroorganisms · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tasja BuschhardtGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Department of Biological Safety, Max-Dohrn-Str. 8-10, 10589 Berlin, Germany.
Taras GüntherGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Department of Biological Safety, Max-Dohrn-Str. 8-10, 10589 Berlin, Germany.
Taran SkjerdalNorwegian Veterinary Institute, Arboretveien 57, N-1433 Ås, Norway.
Mia TorpdahlStatens Serum Institut, 5 Artillerivej, DK-2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark.
Jörn GethmannFriedrich-Loeffler-Institut - Federal Research Institute for Animal Health (FLI), Südufer 10, D-17493 Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany.
Maria-Eleni FilippitziSciensano, Juliette Wytsmanstraat 14, 1050 Elsene, Belgium.
Catharina MaassenNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3721 MA Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Solveig JoreNorwegian Institute of Public Health, Lovisenberggata 8, 0456 Oslo, Norway.
Johanne Ellis-IversenNational Food Institute at the Technical University of Denmark, Kemitorvet 202, DK-2800 Kgs Lyngby, Denmark.
Matthias FilterGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Department of Biological Safety, Max-Dohrn-Str. 8-10, 10589 Berlin, Germany.
OHEJP Glossary Team

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collaboration across sectors, disciplines and countries is a key concept to achieve the overarching One Health (OH) objective for better human, animal and environmental health. Differences in terminology and interpretation of terms are still a significant hurdle for cross-sectoral information exchange and collaboration within the area of OH including One Health Surveillance (OHS). The development of the here described glossary is a collaborative effort of three projects funded within the One Health European Joint Programme (OHEJP). We describe the infrastructure of the OHEJP Glossary, as well as the methodology to create such a cross-sectoral web resource in a collaborative manner. The new OHEJP Glossary allows OH actors to identify terms with different or shared interpretation across sectors. Being aware of such differences in terminology will help overcome communication hurdles in the future and consequently support collaboration and a more inclusive development of OHS. The OHEJP Glossary was implemented as a web-based, user-friendly and searchable infrastructure that complies with the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable (FAIR) data principles. Maintenance, enrichment and quality control of the OHEJP Glossary is supported through a flexible and updatable curation infrastructure. This increases the uptake potential and exploitation of the OHEJP Glossary by other OH initiatives or tools and services.

Indexed as

Definition of termsDictionaryFAIR dataScientific terminologySurveillanceVirtual research environment

Identifiers

PMID34041347
PMCPMC8141924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.