ArticleData in brief2021
Processed HIV prognostic dataset for control experiments.
Article in Data in brief, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper provides a control dataset of processed prognostic indicators for analysing drug resistance in patients on antiretroviral therapy (ART). The dataset was locally sourced from health facilities in Akwa Ibom State of Nigeria, West Africa and contains 14 attributes with 1506 unique records filtered from 3168 individual treatment change episodes (TCEs). These attributes include sex, before and follow-up CD4 counts (BCD4, FCD4), before and follow-up viral load (BRNA, FRNA), drug type/combination (DTYPE), before and follow-up body weight (Bwt, Fwt), patient response to ART (PR), and classification targets (C1-C5). Five (5) output membership grades of a fuzzy inference system ranging from very high interaction to no interaction were constructed to model the influence of adverse drug reaction (ADR) and subsequently derive the PR attribute (a non-fuzzy variable). The PR attribute membership clusters derived from a universe of discourse table were then used to label the classification targets as follows: C1=no interaction, C2=very low interaction, C3=low interaction, C4=high interaction, and C5=very high interaction. The classification targets are useful for building classification models and for detecting patients with ADR. This data can be exploited for the development of expert systems, for useful decision support to treatment failure classification [1] and effectual drug regimen prescription.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.