Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34041307›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2021

Pleomorphic carcinoma of the lung: Prognostic models of semantic, radiomics and combined features from CT and PET/CT in 85 patients.

Chohee Kim, Hwan-Ho Cho, Joon Young Choi, Teri J Franks, Joungho Han, Yeonu Choi, Se-Hoon Lee, Hyunjin Park, Kyung Soo Lee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of radiology open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chohee KimDepartment of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (SKKU-SOM), Seoul, South Korea.
Hwan-Ho ChoDepartment of Electronic and Computer Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, South Korea.
Joon Young ChoiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (SKKU-SOM), Seoul, South Korea.
Teri J FranksDepartment of Pulmonary and Mediastinal Pathology, Department of Defense, The Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Joungho HanDepartment of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (SKKU-SOM), Seoul, South Korea.
Yeonu ChoiDepartment of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (SKKU-SOM), Seoul, South Korea.
Se-Hoon LeeDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (SKKU-SOM), Seoul, South Korea.
Hyunjin ParkSchool of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, South Korea.
Kyung Soo LeeDepartment of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (SKKU-SOM), Seoul, South Korea.
Samsung Medical Center · KRInstitute for Basic Science · KRSungkyunkwan University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo demonstrate semantic, radiomics, and the combined risk models related to the prognoses of pulmonary pleomorphic carcinomas (PCs).

methodsWe included 85 patients (M:F = 71:14; age, 35-88 [mean, 63 years]) whose imaging features were divided into training (n = 60) and test (n = 25) sets. Nineteen semantic and 142 radiomics features related to tumors were computed. Semantic risk score (SRS) model was built using the Cox-least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) approach. Radiomics risk score (RRS) from CT and PET features and combined risk score (CRS) adopting both semantic and radiomics features were also constructed. Risk groups were stratified by the median of the risk scores of the training set. Survival analysis was conducted with the Kaplan-Meier plots.

resultsOf 85 PCs, adenocarcinoma was the most common epithelial component found in 63 (73 %) tumors. In SRS model, four features were stratified into high- and low-risk groups (HR, 4.119; concordance index ([C-index], 0.664) in the test set. In RRS model, five features helped improve the stratification (HR, 3.716; C-index, 0.591) and in CRS model, three features helped perform the best stratification (HR, 4.795; C-index, 0.617). The two significant features of CRS models were the SUVmax and the histogram feature of energy ([CT Firstorder Energy]).

conclusionIn PCs of the lungs, the combined model leveraging semantic and radiomics features provides a better prognosis compared to using semantic and radiomics features separately. The high SUVmax of solid portion (CT Firstorder Energy) of tumors is associated with poor prognosis in lung PCs.

Indexed as

C-index, Concordance indexCRS, Combined risk scoreDL, Deep learningGCLM, Gray-level co-occurrence matrixHR, Hazard rationICC, Intra-class correlationISZM, Intensity size zone matrixKRAS, Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologLASSO, Least absolute shrinkage and selection operatorLDA, Low density areaLungMRI, Magnetic resonance imagingMTV, Metabolic tumor volumeNon-small cell carcinomaPC, Pleomorphic carcinomaPET/CT, Positron emission tomography/Computed tomographyPleomorphic carcinomaPrognosisRadiomicsROI, Region of interestRRS, Radiomics risk scoreSRS, Semantic risk scoreSUVavg, Average standardized uptake valueSUVmax, Maximum standardized uptake valueTLG, Total lesion glycolysisVOI, Volume of interest

Identifiers

PMID34041307
PMCPMC8141891
OpenAlexW3163484565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.