Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34041289›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2021

Garrett J Mullenix, Elizabeth S Greene, Nima K Emami, Guillermo Tellez-Isaias, Walter G Bottje, Gisela F Erf, Michael T Kidd, Sami Dridi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dietary Supplementation withAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  6. In-feedFrontiers in physiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. SpirulinaLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Potential ofFrontiers in immunology · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Garrett J MullenixCenter of Excellence for Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.
Elizabeth S GreeneCenter of Excellence for Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.
Nima K EmamiCenter of Excellence for Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.
Guillermo Tellez-IsaiasCenter of Excellence for Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.
Walter G BottjeCenter of Excellence for Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.
Gisela F ErfCenter of Excellence for Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.
Michael T KiddCenter of Excellence for Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.
Sami DridiCenter of Excellence for Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteins are considered the most expensive nutrients in commercial modern broiler production, and their dietary inclusion at low levels is pivotal to minimize feed costs and reduce nitrogen waste. The quest for an environmentally friendly source of proteins that favor the formulation of low protein diets without compromising broiler health, welfare, and growth performance has become a hotspot in nutrition research. Due to its high protein content, the naturally growing

Indexed as

broilerschemokinescytokinesinflammasomeinflammationlow protein dietSpirulina

Identifiers

PMID34041289
PMCPMC8141556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.