ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2021
Challenges and difficulties in research facing by Saudi board postgraduate residents in Aseer region.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Research in family medicine: Contribution, priorities, and barriers in Saudi Arabia.Journal of family & community medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionResearch in health care system plays an important role in advancement and development of medicine and is essential in identifying the most optimal management. Progression in medicine depends upon the training and performance of researchers in health science. Training in research activity is an important aspect of post graduate training and has been recognized as one of its key components. It enhances learning and critical thinking of the resident.
methodsA purposely constructed questionnaire was used to gather the data, questionnaire was composed on demographic items, items related to the problems/difficulties regarding research, items related to specialty selection. Questionnaire was composed of by the panel of experts including subject (research faculty of the college) specialist, English language expert, family physician.
resultsMean ± S.D of age = 29.2 ± 8.6. 62.0% of the respondents were belongs to the age group of 25-30 years old, 22.% belongs to the 31-35 years old. 44.1% were female while 55.9% were male. Only 13.0% of the respondents finished the residency program (17.1% in R1, 25.7% in R2, 21.6% in R3, 13.6% in R4 while 2.5% in R5 and 6.7% as an adhoc). 51.6% have experience of healthcare from 1 to 3 years. 31.3% respondents participated in the research as a co-author while 26.3% participated in a research as principal investigator.
conclusionTo conclude, it is necessary to guide the students to conduct studies and keep them motivated. It is also important to reward them so keep their interest intact in research. In this view involving students in research committee and providing them a platform for presentation are very good methods to keep them motivated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.